Maxing out internet memory? Do you mean internal memory?
Youre a genius! You figured that out so quickly! I think ill put a golden star in the ceiling just for you 3
Now if you say ChatGPT can help improve the English grammar of the paper
It would be great if you could configure it, I remember reading about some AI where that was possible on Slashdot some time ago, but didn't put it to memory.
Anyway, I was baffled by it at first, and also with the image generation. This "amazement" has been reduced over time. The problem with text checking, is that it only has one setting, you can't just ask "Capitalize words and sentences correctly", "Structure this enjambment into prose", or "Replace bad words". The last one was surprising, I had written a review on Literotica on a short story, and figured, since everything there is reviewed before posting, the text needed to look better. It was late at night, I was tired, so i just put it in chatGPT and added it to the site.
Then, the next day, I looked at what it had actually done to the text. "Get your rocks off", was censored to "Thrilled". I didn't know that was a slur? I guess "Get off" is sorta offensive in some way whatsoever, but why does it need to do all 3 sorts of these edits, and you can't even chose which one(s)? There's also no simple "copy & paste" button. And for mathematical things, copying the equation to another program, or just pasting it in chatGPT itself breaks the formatting. Again, it would be nice if you could configure it more, or, well, at all...
If the company wants to ensure they're not on vacation when they're supposed to be at work, this is a good way of doing it.
Employers go on expensive vacations all the time.
Startup valuation is deeply related to forecasts.
No, it's only related to hype. No AI companies are going plus. They never will. Somehow Spotify's CEO is the richest man in the music industry, and Spotify is still bleeding money. And the AI hype is only to usher in Agenda2030. And Spotify's hype is only so record companies can do business as usual.
The maximum text length in a single input or output for ChatGPT-4 (both in terms of the length of your prompt and the length of the response) is generally determined by token limits.
In ChatGPT-4:
Input: The total number of tokens (which include both input and output tokens) you can use in a single session is approximately 8,000 tokens (for GPT-4) or 4,000 tokens (for GPT-3.5).
Output: The model's response can include up to the remaining tokens after accounting for the tokens in your input. If your input is 4,000 tokens, the response would be limited to about 4,000 tokens.
A "token" can be as short as one character or as long as one word. For example, the word "ChatGPT" counts as one token, and so does the letter "a." However, complex words and punctuation can split into multiple tokens.
In practice, this means that the maximum text length is approximately:
Around 6,000 to 7,000 words per full exchange if the text is simple.
Shorter for dense or highly punctuated text.
This makes the effective maximum input text length typically a few thousand words, depending on the complexity of the text.
It’s important to note that this limit includes both the input (what you write) and the output (the response from the model). So, if you provide a very long input, the space left for the model's response will be reduced accordingly.
So paying for it actually doesn't increase the limit? And I wonder if it's only me, but since a few weeks back, you don't even have to pay for the image generator? And I'm annoyed that 1) Gmail still only supports 25mb attachments, which I figured was made back in the day so you couldn't pirate a whole album. 2) Google Translate only supports 5000 characters at a time (it also cuts off words if they are exactly at the limit). Again, probably so people couldn't translate whole books and print them and make money off of doing nothing. Which is exactly what AI is enabling people to do nowadays. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.bitchute.com/video...
re:
but I've always balked at adding another $20/mo bill
This is really don't understand, maybe. Just like piracy, but I've written about that previously here (I think?). Back in the 90s, it costed more to download an mp3 on dial-up than it took to buy an entire album, but my parents were paying then so I didn't care, and mp3 was cool! And hip! And you didn't have to go to a record store! I ended up forgetting my CDs then.
in a little over a year, thousands of users have signed up for Cursor
So they have $ 400 million in financing, but only "thousands" are using it? And it's even worse than that, it's only people who have signed up, not how many are actually using it, or are paying for it.
"Ada is PL/I trying to be Smalltalk. -- Codoso diBlini