Submission + - More Stanford Computing Courses go free (i-programmer.info)
This open approach looks as if it might be a sucess with well over 100,000 prospective students signing up to the AI course alone.
Submission + - 2011 Hugo Awards (renovationsf.org)
The winners were announced Saturday, August 20th, 2011, during the Hugo Awards Ceremony at Renovation in Reno, Nevada. 2011 Hugo Award Winners 2100 valid voting ballots were counted and presented at
Submission + - Hacker Steve Built Hand-Mounted Tacit Sonar Device (geektech.in)
Submission + - You have taste receptors in your lungs (io9.com) 1
Submission + - Robotic hands grip without fingers (sciencemag.org)
Comment Why not Google for Governments? (Score 1, Interesting) 484
So, the obvious question becomes why DOESN'T google start something like Google for Governments, and offer legislative tools for all levels of Government, from local to federal.
Have easy, gmail-style interfaces to thread-based tool which exposes version changes and their source - and then make it open to the public so the public can see who, exactly, introduced what, and further, have it linked to relavent, search-based results. Offer it free to Governments to use in all proceedings, from City Council meetings to Senate subcommittees, and if Governments elect not to use the tools, then for the general public, automate the same sort of bill tracking, infographics, &c., and incorporate public secrets-type info to elevate what is a great existing resource beyond a wall of text such that voters can have a sense of where, and why, actions are taken (or not).
Again, why doesn't google do what it does best, organize information for consumption? This seems like a slam dunk for Google - they have the knowledge, skills and abilities in house, and have already/are currently developing the traditionally hard parts (e.g., linking information) as a part of their core business.