Not crazy, just sadly inattentive: you didn't even manage to read to the end of the summary. >The researchers also highlighted that the association was independent of underlying factors such as body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and lipid levels, which might predispose people to low-calorie products. If you've looked at this kind of population level or meta-study work before, you'd know that it's expected for them to check for known or possible correlations across other factors and control for them. It's simple enough to compare prevalence of cardiac events across only subgroups with similar BMI, incidence of diabetes, etc, and you should be looking to see what factors were controlled for in the methodology when reading about this kind of study. I suppose it's easy to convince someone that something could be a conspiracy when they don't know how anything works, and can't be bothered to read in order to find out.

LLMs talking to each other seem to act like strange attractors, where a particular LLM or pair of LLMs converge on an end state that they endlessly cycle. Here's a primer on attractors with a pretty simulation of a Lorenz Attractor: https://www.dynamicmath.xyz/st... And here's a set of experiments where you can observe that LLMs similarly settle in an endless cycle of nonsense: https://www.lesswrong.com/post... So the content of Moltbook is essentially useless and void of any meaning. But the fact that it's designed to look like social media gives Meta excellent cover for acquiring it. But owning Moltbook doesn't just net you the contents. It allows you to send messages (less politely: prompt injections) to a large number of AI instances. These messages could cause them to disclose information, work on specific tasks, or provide them with an API key and induce them to comment or like certain Facebook posts to boost ideas or products Meta is being paid to promote.

This new drug promises to be a great weapon against the Amyloid Cascade hypothesis. Itâ(TM)s a shame it likely wonâ(TM)t be as effective against Alzheimerâ(TM)s Disease. The timing is unfortunate: we have known for a while now that even the most potent Beta Amyloid clearing drugs have only a marginal impact at best. But while the leading edge of research searches for other mechanisms, we donâ(TM)t have anything thatâ(TM)s more effective, either. https://bigthink.com/neuropsyc...

Iâ(TM)ve always wondered what happens as LLM output becomes a larger portion of the web and the models have to eat their own dogfood. ChatGPT can now search Bing and summarize the top five ChatGPT-authored SEO-crammed webpages for answers, so I guess weâ(TM)ll know soon.

Old hat. Even the 20% economy improvement has been ripped off prior scam-device claims of similar variety.

The entire class of vaporization enhancement devices has been thoroughly done away with: http://www.fuelsaving.info/atomisation.htm

A device using an electric field to affect gasoline vaporization is particularly dubious: gasoline being a non-polar fluid, it is entirely unaffected by electric fields.