Link to Original Source
Really? I've not been able to find anything other than a new release. The patches might be in git, but they are not easily found.
Explain Union Shops. If you aren't a member of the union and pay your dues, you don't get to work there.
Bingo. People keep presuming things that they shouldn't. LiFi's a consume only thing in the large. It's not as useful as people believe it to be. As I said earlier on this discussion for TFA- this is a solution looking for problems to solve.
Hint: It's largely one-way. It doesn't bring office space magic unless it's two way- and while there's two-way LiFi, it's got it's own set of issues.
They already have this. It's called HomePlug. For most situations in most homes you can get gigabit links over your house wiring.
Heh. They're using DC strip lights with an AC->DC power supply and possibly a bit of intelligence on top of the constant current switcher.
Thing is, if you're doing the converter at the room level, you're still using 110 mains, etc. This doesn't gain you anything. LiFi is intriguing (in that it took them this long to "get" there) but it's limited in what it can/can't do... It's a solution looking for problems to solve.
I doubt there IS one...
People keep fallaciously saying this... If it makes you feel better, by all means keep repeating it to yourself. You don't
1) Understand HOW a President gets elected (Seriously- if you mention "popular vote" in this context, you DO NOT KNOW.)
2) Understand that it's not what YOU wish, but what a lot of other people think that you clearly know nothing about.
While I didn't agree with the man's take on things, I thought Romney was going to take it because of anti-Dem fervor back then. Clearly I was wrong. Pontificating like you have here, you're likely to be that too. Just don't act shocked, pissed, etc. when it doesn't work out that way. I won't agree with you then and I won't have any sympathy either.
I honestly wish people would realize this fact. Bill Clinton WAS Impeached- he was just not convicted of the accusations in the Articles of Impeachment.
"X11 Windowing System"
There *is* a reason they didn't let them Trademark "Windows" but could do "Microsoft Windows".
Heh. You'd be surprised. While it doesn't directly do that, it DOES set that most of the rules for content are unconstitutional.
Courts have been slow to appreciate the expressive power of trademarks. Words, even a single word can be powerful. Mr. Simon Shiao
Tam named his band THE SLANTS to make a statement about racial and cultural issues in this country. With his band name, Mr. Tam conveys more about our
society than many volumes of undisputedly protected speech. Another rejected mark, STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA, proclaims that Islamisation is undesirable and shouldbe stopped. Many of the marks rejected as disparaging convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft stigmatized communties. But
the First Amendment protects even hurtful speech.
The government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the expressive messages conveyed by the marks. It cannot refuse to register marks because it concludes that such marks will be disparaging to others. The government regulation at issue amounts to viewpoint discrimination, and
under the strict scrutiny review appropriate for government regulation of message or viewpoint, we conclude that the disparagement proscription of 2(a) is unconstitutional.
Because the government has offered no legitimate interests justifying 2(a), we conclude that it would also be unconstitutional under the intermediate scrutiny
traditionally applied to regulation of the commercial aspects of speech.
The reasoning is immediately applicable to the content rules.
It also killed mold. That's part of why it ended up in household paints.
"There is no statute of limitations on stupidity." -- Randomly produced by a computer program called Markov3.