Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:How about spending... (Score 1) 66

Basically, I want the government to have as few options for rewriting history or burn bagging documents without screwing up publicly accessible metadata as possible

Indeed, if they had implemented blockchain back in 2019, it would have been plainly obvious if someone had retroactively revised government hurricane prediction plots with a Sharpie.

Comment Hmmmm. (Score 2) 36

It's basically a year to a year and a half off people's life expectancies, from the heat alone.

Although this is not trivial, the antivaxxer movement will likely chop 10-15 years off life expectancies and greatly reduce quality of life for much of the remainder, same again for the expected massive reduction in air quality that will result from modern political movements, and the absurd puritanical movement in the US will likely chop another 10-15 years off the life expectancies of women.

These are, therefore, substantially more significant, although politically impossible to deal with right now.

I fully expect that, if current trends prevail, by 2040, life expectancies will resemble those of the Neolithic and Bronze Ages.

Comment Due to circumstances (Score 1) 209

Attending work for 2 days means I pay £190 per week to work, with no recompense from the company. Because there's a decent amount of holiday time, my wages have only dropped £9000 per year from last year. If I needed to attend 5 days a week, I would have to leave the only job that I have ever held that actually made any functional effort to handle my disabilities. In other words, if I lost this job, I would not be capable of functionally working in any job at all, simply because most companes don't give a damn about disabilities. Legally, however, I would be deemed "capable of work". As such, I would have no wages and no benefits. Once my money ran out, I'd be on the streets. There is simply no viable alternative.

If a business guy thinks adding to the homeless is the best way to improve work morale, then maybe he's not a business guy that holds any opinion of value. He may well be listened to, which will cause a LOT of problems for a LOT of people and WILL increase unemployent and, in countries with failing industry, increase the homelessness of people who are far more competent than him, but that does not make his opinion valuable, merely incredibly stupid and sickeningly naive.

Comment Re:I see both sides of this (Score 5, Insightful) 224

It sickens me that some of the most fertile land in the country, if not the world, is being covered by solar panels.

If a shortage of corn becomes a problem in the future, the panels can be removed. In the meantime, if the extra electricity speeds the adoption of EVs, then we can *burn* less of our food in ICE cars. We're currently dedicating more than a third of all those cornfields just for that. There's no plausible scenario where a third of all the cornfields would be converted to solar arrays anyway.

Comment Re:Two Words: Trump (Score 1, Funny) 77

Geez can't you just give the FTC credit on one issue where they're getting it right?

That's only because the gold-plated chalice that LA Fitness's CEO is mailing to the White House is on backorder.

(Inventory is low. Lately there seems to have been a run on these items for some reason.)

Comment Re:20%? (Score 1) 169

It is reputed that there are water or sewer pipes in New York that are wood and date back to the early 1800s in not before. Lack of maintenance will catch up with you eventually

Yep, you've got to sand down those pipes and slap on a fresh coat of spar urethane at least every three years.

Comment Re:Runabouts Don't Sell in the USA (Score 4, Insightful) 247

I keep seeing these posts about what's needed to get people into an EV, and the bar keeps getting raised.

Frankly, we don't need high speed chargers to be as common a gas pumps, as the majority of gas pumps are for local use, and most charging is slow-speed at home. (We do need good solutions for those who rent or have on-street parking, though.) And for trips in the USA, if you're on the Interstate, you shouldn't need to think about it if you can use the Tesla Superchargers. Non-Interstate trips are getting more coverage, so most of those trips work now, too.

Posts about why you can't switch to an EV now sound more like excuses that real reasons, which is why goal posts keep moving. There are many good reasons why people who switch to EVs rarely switch back.

Comment Back in the day... (Score 2) 22

I remember when IBM, SGI, Infornix, Oracle, and HP first got involved in Linux. At the time, I included patches from some of them in the Functionally Overloaded Linux Kernel.

I proposed, back then, a simple league table for commercial support of Linux: Every new major feature or software product got so many points, and every bugfix release got a smaller number of points. Kernel features that made it into the mainstream kernel would qualify as goals for, kernel features and products discontinued were goals against. Closed-source contributions got half points, and were also considered goals against.

It would then be obvious which companies were serious and which were piggybacking, and it would also be clear who understood the philosophy, not just the opportunity.

Such a table would have ensured that nobody forgot the companies who contributed. Quite the opposite. There'd be an incentive to encourage the team you supported to improve position in the table.

Of course, no such league table ever happened. I could have maintained such a table without difficulty, but it would require the vendors to openly say what they'd contributed. I couldn't invent one out of thin air.

So I'd say Oracle has to look at themselves, not just the Linux community.

Comment Re:It would be surprising if it wasn't shedding mo (Score 1) 36

It's possible to conjecture - we know it collided with something massive, so if said body contained very limited radioactive materials, one might expect this to reduce the radioactivity per unit mass.

Is this the answer? Probably not, but it's good enough (I think) to argue that a simple answer is possible.

Comment Re:Internal combustion isn't dead yet (Re:zip zap) (Score 1) 144

The problem is in the fuel, and we can fix that.

Right. People in this country threaten to riot if gas prices go above $4/gal.

Synthetic gas that is genuinely carbon neutral (not just greenwashing like ethanol) will never be less than $20/gal.

In theory, that would work if people were willing to pay more and get more efficient vehicles. In reality, in this country, no fucking way.

Slashdot Top Deals

How many Bavarian Illuminati does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Three: one to screw it in, and one to confuse the issue.

Working...