Subject Datestamp Replies Score
Re:Thank YOU from a long-time /. reader  *Friday August 26, 2011 @04:24PM  1
   attached to So Long, CmdrTaco, and Thanks For All The Posts
Re:Practicum first, then theory  *Tuesday June 04, 2002 @03:07AM  1
   attached to Conceptual Models of a Program?
Re:Comments lie. Code never lies.  *Thursday March 21, 2002 @04:46AM  2, Insightful
   attached to Beginning Project Documentation?
Re:Quake?  *Thursday September 20, 2001 @07:05AM  1
   attached to 2.2 GHz Xeon
Re:This is stupid  *Friday September 14, 2001 @07:34AM 1 1
   attached to Congress Considers Mandatory Crypto Backdoors
Only patents for individuals: not a solution.  *Wednesday August 01, 2001 @08:56AM 2 1
   attached to Battling the Patent Trolls
Re:There are sites that require IE  *Wednesday September 13, 2000 @03:10AM  1
   attached to IE 5.5 Tracking Default Bookmarks
Re:Illegal Fireworks?  *Tuesday July 04, 2000 @02:38AM  2
   attached to And the Rockets' Red Glare
Re:One word answer:  *Tuesday May 30, 2000 @01:18AM  1
Re:Unlearning is ESPECIALLY necessary for new grad  *Tuesday May 30, 2000 @12:59AM  1
   attached to Too Old To Code?
Re:What's the advantage of XML over EBNF?  *Wednesday May 03, 2000 @01:36AM  1
What's the advantage of XML over EBNF?  *Wednesday May 03, 2000 @01:34AM  1
   attached to Can XML Replace Proprietary Document Formats?
Coming to Ame^H^H^HCanada(Was Re:Woohoo!)  *Sunday February 13, 2000 @02:37PM  1
   attached to Ottawa Linux Symposium 2000
Re:First Inventor Defense != Prior Art  *Friday January 07, 2000 @03:51AM  1
   attached to Is H.R.1907 Patent Reform that We Want?
Dutch privacy law 101  *Tuesday November 30, 1999 @01:27AM  1
   attached to Profiling A Nation