Why do I never have mod points when I -REALLY- need them?

+1 Funny

At least in the US, isn't it illegal to record someone in a private space without their knowledge/consent?

So you wear one of these into someone's house or business or a Dr's office waiting room and manage to catch HIPPA violating snippets as people check in.

This is the kind of willfully ignorant, close minded pathetic responses that really pisses me off.

So because some vehicles still use fossil fuel, we should make absolutely no advancements towards renewables? If it can't be a 100% changeover all at once it's not worth doing?

I wish stupidity was painful.

Can't wait to watch how this plays out.

This is my pet peeve. AI has been turned into a marketing term for things that are not the traditional definition of AI.
The term is now corrupted beyond all hope of recovery.
I'm distressed at how much tools like Chat GPT favor seeming intelligent and capable as an illusion even when lying to you. I've even caught it making a mistake and then blaming me for the mistake or pretending it meant to do it wring as a test step. The conman element is real,. even down to the tool itself.

Who exactly approved a design/contract that prevents repairs during deployment? That's quite literally insane for a fighting vessel.
Someone needs to be fired/investigated and held accountable.

This is well known information and any professional chef could have told you this.

Ah, so we're going to pivot the argument and pretend that is about slavery since all other reasonable arguments lead to a realization of how nonsensical this whole thing is?

"Claude Opus 4 tries to blackmail engineers 84% of the time when the replacement AI model has similar values"

Say what now?

AI did the flooding? Not humans, using AI? AI created them, registered them and uploaded them?

Why does the headline team at /. have to be so comically bad?

Bookmark this, check back in a few months

Republicans want to kill SS.

No software architect alive would promise to rebuild 60 million lines of highly regulated legal rules in 6 months.

After a lifetime of SS theft by the government, "borrowing" from the SS fund, suddenly with the "discovery" of issues by Musk's hit team, they'll find a reason to advertise that SS had to be cut off and they'll sharply decrease payments and eligibility. It's exactly the kind of thing that would make Trumps base start taking more shots at him, but it'll be wrappered in efficiency and problem solving so that people do not even see that their lifetime of paying into SS is being stolen from them.

I understand your point. My resistance is more to the topic of why is it a US foreign aid issue to fund relocating Asians in Asia?
I feel bad for these people who have been victimized. But lets see the outrage pointed at the countries not responding to the return of their citizens rather than paint a picture of how this is somehow the USs fault. Why is their help somehow dependent on US aide from a country that already has vastly too much debt? Where is the rest of the world's assistance on this? Shouldn't that program properly be funded by most countries and the US is just one cup of water in that 5 gallon bucket?

While I think it's tragic in regards to the slapadash chaos that is the Trump administration's approach to destroying everything that they do not like, I think it's petty and unfair of the article to say "The recent abrupt halt to U.S. foreign aid funding..."
The article describes an issue on the opposite side of the world, and mentions no US citizen involvement, but yet somehow finds the nerve to point at a lack of US funding as contributing to the issue with getting these people home? Keep your pet agendas out of the news, please.

That's shockingly idiotic, sorry.

That they did not ask for it to happen is EXACTLY the point. A foreign power did it, unsolicited offered it to the Dems who did not respond.

That's almost literally the opposite of Trump asking/encouraging it be done in his favor

A guy who stands to gain from a nationalistic stance on AI making a nationalistic stance on AI?
Man, who saw that coming, eh?