I'm not seeing a paywall on the site. uBlock Origin must be doing something.

The UHF app on our Apple TVs & iOS devices and the UHF Server in Docker to act as a PVR gives us everything for a few $ a month paid in crypto.
We haven't had cable since ~1999-2000. Downloading and the *arrs have kept us happy, but the better half wanted to check out some live sports. So IPTV it was.

One of our guys said something to the effect of "Copilot is Corporate Chat. It knows all the useless filler of management-speak, but lacks the competence of the people in the trenches.

Ouch.

I've used Claude at home for ages. Work was wanting to get some AI stuff for us and the only 'blessed' one is CoPilot. Everything else it blocked. All senior management seems to know about AI is "Hurrr... Copilot and ChatGPT."

Out team of ~8 (pentestesting & VA) were unanimous about Copilot being crap and Claude being the top dog. So some higher ups OK'd a Claude Teams package for work. To bypass the CorpSec tards, we use it from our lab environment that has its own unmonitored link and IP range.

Anthropic/Claude is just so far ahead of OpenAI/ChatGPT and MS/Copilot it's not funny.

He's just bombing more countries than any other president.

Windows 11 is the problem.

Since humans created AI, yes, AI is part of the problem. But only because of humans.

As to what to do about it, another round of covid or something similar) should help nicely with all the anti-vaxxers out there.

If it's not safe to merge, they did the right thing. Or should they just force their way into moving traffic?

The orange guy has given out multiple pardons to people convicted of fraud, corruption, and drug dealing after they "donated" to his campaign.

The most recent example is the former governor of Puerto Rico who plead guilty in a federal corruption case. The daughter gave over $3 million to Trump's PAC, MAGA, after which the pardon was given.

The OP was merely mentioning that with all the other criminals getting pardons after paying their tribute, apparently this group didn't give theirs.

"Never lose your users' data" is kinda Rule #1.

Steve Jobs said something similar regarding Apple OS upgrades. You never touch user data.

Not sure why this is a difficult concept to understand.

We have 8 billion+ people on the planet. We can afford to lose a billion or so and not affect our ability to advance science. Having fewer people would definitely enhance wellbeing as there would be less pollution which means cleaner air and water. Less trash would be produced as well.

Clearly we had no problem with scientific advancements when our population was lower. With what we have now, why would you think fewer people would change that?

Helmets also make it easier to ID the riders if they get squished by a truck or similar. If the head is intact you don't need to resort to DNA or teeth.

Fun fact: if you blow yourself up, your head is how they identify you because it separates from the body.

One nice thing is this will help to reduce the world's population, thus helping to mitigate the effects of climate change.

They'd be so upset if they knew they were helping the planet recover.

Citation please. Not that local airlines don't weigh passengers, they do, but because it has "an obesity problem". Again, you post pure hatred, something you are known for.

Nope, OP is correct. From 2019:

But yeah, nothing but pure hatred for an airline to realize they were burning more fuel because of overweight/obese passengers.

From 2023, a list of airlines which charge more for overweight passengers, though some do offer a refund on the extra amount under certain conditions.

Note: Southwest changed their policy to now require an overweight/obese person to purchase two seats at the time of their booking. If a passenger in need of an extra seat does not buy one before the flight, they will be required to do so at the airport.

"You cannot make a return on investment if you don't have access to the U.S. market," Doesn't sound like saving lives is their purpose

If you're going to spend $1 billion making and trialing a vaccine, why wouldn't you want a return on that investment? Do you think they should do this for free? Where would they get the money to make and trial the next vaccine or drug?

That the anti-vaxxer Kennedy has brought this on is not unexpected. No matter how much the facts show vaccines are safe and effective, he would rather see people die or be mangled for life.