The math is pretty easy... even if you had 100,000 riders/day for 50 years, it would still cost over $120/day/rider to pay off the initial investment - that doesn't even count ongoing costs. If you're paying interest on $231B, those 100k riders at $120 won't even pay the interest. $300-400+ per ticket would probably be necessary, but no one's going to pay that.

I think the biggest technical problem is that I don't think people with that kind of "net worth" really personally own what gives them that worth. There's already a lot of incentives to not have assets in your name (protecting against lawsuits, divorce, etc.), so how many of these billionaires are actually penniless in a legal sense?

Basically, you could have billions in a checking account owned by a trust, and just be an "authorized user" on a credit card that some lawyer trustee pays off from the trust. Congrats! You have no wealth to tax.

They're certainly not going to break it out in the future, regardless of any threats. Any company that did has now created a specific liability, and could end up receiving tons of small claims cases if they don't refund. Companies that didn't can just claim they absorbed the cost, and don't owe anyone anything.

Even 4k is questionable when all most people do is stream. If I look at our 4k TV up close, "4k" streams really aren't.

PJM commits to keeping existing residential and business grids stable, and not increase their prices.

"Excess" users like AI data centers, crypto miners, etc. must bid once per day with a max price/kWh they're willing to pay. As long as there's no shortage, everyone pays normal rates, and it's fine. If they run out of capacity, then the excess users are shut off from lowest to highest.
For example, five AI data centers bid 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50c/kWh today. If capacity is low, the 10c DC gets shut off, and the rest pay 20c/kWh. If it's still not enough, the 20c/kWh is shut off, and the rest pay 30c/kWh, etc. Ties are not broken - everyone bidding the same gets shut down at the same time, even if it's not strictly necessary (this is to prevent collusion).
Then the ones causing the problem are the only ones that suffer, and the ones that can't make it economically will go somewhere else.

Haven't the various martial arts taught basically this for centuries? The Japanese "kiai"/Korean "kihap" basically do the same without the vulgar vocabulary...

No, it's a great business plan. Add a feature that means the car is undrivable if the customer disables or blocks your location-tracking-for-sale device. Bonus! Make it an additional option they PAID for!

Not really - they're sitting in people's coin jars.

We've been trying to get rid of our giant jar of coins for years, but banks won't take them unless we spend hours rolling them up, and things like coinstar charge outrageous fees - so tons of coins just sit around because we literally can't reasonably put them back in circulation.

Most people are only streaming everything now, and with compression, the image quality is way worse than what most TVs are capable of displaying.

What might be starting to happen is that there are increasing numbers of these "snowflake" employees that are offended by everything, can't take a joke, etc. For them, "normal" people are toxic because OMG! they occasionally make a slightly off-color joke, or something, then go straight to HR. So they think the workplace is toxic because they're forced to be exposed to that. Normal people then have to carefully watch every word that comes out of their mouths, can't have any fun or relax, so they consider the snowflakes toxic. So basically, everyone thinks it's toxic, and it really only takes one snowflake per office to make it like that.

If they won't respect robots.txt, maybe they'll stay off your site if you stick random gibberish poison pages all over the site.

Any organization that knows what it's doing will have parallel promotion tracks for management and non-management.

In the specific case of my company, I "Sr. Solutions Architect" have a job grade roughly equivalent to a director, and above that of anyone called "manager", "supervisor", or the Sr. versions thereof. The "principal architect" I work with is equivalent to the sr. director that manages the whole team. I think the individual track tops out around VP/SVP level here. And yes, a non-sr. director can be managing an SVP-level non-management employee.

The next human driver cited for this should file a civil rights lawsuit claiming racial discrimination. Since there's apparently video evidence of "we don't/can't ticket robots" (rather than a hard to prove "officers have discretion" type thing), it might stick, especially if it goes before a jury.

Can we please re-classify our annual bonuses as "tips" from the company?

Because you can't compete with the efficiency with which the world creates idiots and assholes.