IF (and that if statement is doing some really heavy lifting here) I could trust Meta, I'd gladly pay for an official "no ads, not tracking" experience.. however, that if has an and to it...
The and being "AND they provide a default 'no algorithm, just show me my friends feed' experience"
Yes I know you can use
https://www.facebook.com/?filt...
To kind of get that but like ... make it work.
The issues with FB are not just about the ads but about their constant need to "get you to engage" it leads to the algorithm pushing the most outrage it can to build engagement.
I use Facebook because I have a lot of meat-space people I want to keep in contact with - a bunch of friends who I might not be intimately involved in their day to day lives but with whom I share a connection and like to kind of "keep an ear out" when they have something important in their life..
I never felt connected to a community on twitter (before it was Xhitter) and or on BlueSky etc.. that is great as a "digital town square" where you go to interact with a more public sphere..
But the way I like to use Facebook is to have a nice private bubble of people I actually want to interact with.
Social bubbles CAN be bad but so long as it's an 'objective reality/truth permeable membrane' (as in so long as your bubble is insulating you from horrible people but not from objective reality/truth) then I think social bubbles can be good and even necessary - to keep one from constantly "drinking from the fire-hose"
So yeah, IF I could trust Meta, IF they'd honor the actual do not track and no ads, not boosted or sponsored content, and IF I could get an experience that isn't algorithmically directed toward outrage and "engagement" I'd gladly pay for it.
If it wasn't such a PITA, I'd probably look into using a VPN to come in via a European country and get a paid account under those rules - cuz you know they're not gonna offer it here in the US where we have absolute shite data protection laws