How does MAVEN still cost 22mil a year when it actually only sends some data to antennas here which are also used for other satellites? Does it have a full dedicated crew of tens of people with a hefty salary, as I would suspect it be part of a crew of several ongoing missions. I have a feeling somebody is inflating their budget without any need.

By the time they have an actual production version of the reactors ready we'll probably already have fusion or another better as this chloride-molten-salt version.

I'm conflicted about it, on the one hand I applaud her for doing this as filming in public without consent is just awful, especially those 'influencers/tiktokmorons', but on the other hand, just smashing somebody's device without first giving them a chance to turn it off is also not the way to go. And how is filming with glasses any different as with a smartphone, bodycam or dashcam... Again, the biggest problem I have is just filming anybody without their consent and putting it on the internet, especially for money, but then again, putting it on the internet for gaining money makes it commercial use, and then you actually have to get consent from the people you're filming, in a lot of countries.

Yeah, Russia and Ukraine are at war, but was it a Russian drone that attacked the dome? Ukraine has more reason to attack it and blame Russia, so they hope Europe will poor more money into them (their leaders already shown nothing has changed over the decades in how corrupt they are) . Chernobyl is very close to russian border, so if the dome cracks and nuclear radiation escapes, it might hit russia. But of course it might be possible for a russian drone on its way to Kyiv to be misguided and hit the dome by accident. Yeah Russians are morons and not very nice, but in this war nothing is as it seems, and we in the west don't seem to get the real/full story.

At least robotcars will learn about this situation and all get updated accordingly to try and handle it better next time. Human drivers don't.

Bullshit, nowhere in the world fo pedestrians have the right of way when crossing a street unless at a crossingpath. BUT that the driver getting the blame even if its the pedestrians fault is another matter (and IMHO completely insane).

Why should sanctions be increased? It's not like countries like the US are crapping all over other countries, just look at venezuela or their ristrictions on companies like ASML blocking them from shipping stuff to China.

But that's not what other sites mentioned. As I understand, it wasn't a peptalk, it just answered the question in how to do it.. why shouldn't it answer that question? A human would.

So why should ChatGPT be responsible and not the weaponmanufacturer? Unless ChatGPT kept pushing the user every single day into trying to kill him-/herself, I really don't see why ChatGPT should be held accountable for the suicide. It's just all about trying to get millions of dollars for the parents who want to put the blame on others while they haven't done anything themselves to help the person.

Why still have cables up in the air? Are we living in the dark ages? Put them in the ground, that's a much better way and looks much better for the area.

That's EU's own fault for not standing up against the US for blocking european companies from doing business with China and increasing tariffs themselves. Most restrictions China puts on are due to restrictions they gotten put on them. When we accept the US from blocking companies like ASML selling their machines to China, we cripple our own economy, we should not stand for that, especially since most parts of the machine aren't even US designed.

But users want to be able to use hvec hardware en-/decoding, so manufacturers supply it.

Yes calculators already had this for many decades, but it just shows how much more energy a common remote uses for not having been able to use it. Now most remotes for new devices are just bluetooth and not IR based, and BT chips have become so much more power efficient that it can work good enough with a solar-element on the remote to add enough charge to the battery so it doesn't drain too much by usage. As during the day most remotes are not in use, so keep charging.

I think as a user you have every right to sue them for removing a hardware feature it was advertised with. The only reason they removed it was because they didn't want to pay the extra license fee as they lost a lawsuit for patent infringement. But I also wonder if you could just enable it again with a (hacked) patch, as they removed it with a patch.

AV1 is only supported on newer chips, not older, so for a LOT of devices AV1 is still not being used as software decoding of it is very slow on any older device not supporting AV1 through hardware.