Posting to remove unintentional and incorrect moderation.

Canada is a world leader in nuclear safety and has been since WWII. And this is Ontario Power Generation. They're no stranger to nuclear power – around half our generation is nuclear.

To be fair, I think Atlantis nailed that pretty well too, so it stands to reason they could pull it off again, given the same showrunners.

A digital tag vastly simplifies the process and makes it possible to change prices several times a week, even per day. This isn't feasible with paper price tags.

It's not that the possibility exists - it always has. It's that digital price tags enable it to be done en masse and instantly.

The five cameras in the corner are very obviously cameras, and not hidden or disguised.

These "smart glasses", on the other hand, or effectively covert cameras, disguised as regular glasses.

They are not the same.

This article reads like AI slop, which is... ironic...

So I'll assume the "tapes" part is clickbait. Or that tapes are the author's first experience with physical media.

Cassette tapes are (arguably) the worst music storage media ever made. Every time you use them, they degrade — and you can't tell by how much, because you can't see or understand the mechanism by which the player works. At least you can see it (the reader contact9ing the media) with vinyl, and CDs/DVDs didn't involve physical contact. Never you mind the possibility of the machine eating the tape. Tapes really are the worst media music was ever stored on.

Now... physical media instead of digital? That, I get. If you want to quit streaming, by all means, I'm with you. But for the love of all things holy, don't go back to tape media.

Yes. It's a stupid question.

But making it actually happen is where the challenge is.

Dude, it's not an "insult". It's a generic term for "people who don't understand how cookies work". Insulting me doesn't help your argument either.

I'm arguing that this will not be a simple solution once implemented. Sure, lots of people understand how to allow or deny cookies. But this solution seems like you'll have to do that for every site regardless. Either that or a default deny, as another poster suggested, and then users get asked - and then we're right back to where we started.

This very much on the definition of "harmless uses", and that's very subjective. A simple yes/no would also allow or deny login cookies, too. It can't be a simple yes/no.

I don't think this will be any kind of workable solution.

And they get asked for every site that wants to place a cookie?

Now we're right back to where we started...

It is if have less money. At least that way you have a chance.

They always have. Back in my day (shit I'm getting old), it was illegal to sell tickets for more than the face value where I live, which stopped bulk purchases. You'd still find scalpers outside ball games and concerts trying to make a few bucks off tickets - and I have no problem with that model. It's the wholesale buying up of entire venues I don't like.

And how exactly will that happen? Will preferences be set at the browser level for doubleclick, google, etc? Do we expect joe sixpack to understand how to do this?

I'm not sure this is any better.

My thoughts exactly.

They should have said it was the equivalent of 0.00005 basketballs floating on top of 0.0000004 Olympic-sized swimming pools. Much easier to understand.

Tell me you're a fucking idiot, without telling me you're a fucking idiot.