Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Future Tech (Score 1) 38

A future article: Scientists have discovered a technique that allows identification of a person using only the advanced technology you likely already carry with you, and which is not affected by the ambient electromagnetic interference that is omnipresent in our technological society. It allows tracking a person from room to room with a near-perfect degree of accuracy, provided that each room is irradiated between approximately 380 and 700 nanometers. The technique begins to falter outside of this range, so it's not perfect. However, it has been shown to be able to distinguish a person from others even in crowded areas, which opens up a plethora of heretofore untapped potential.

As an added bonus, we are all carrying a pair of electromagnetic receivers that can directly detect this range of the electromagnetic spectrum, so this technique is very cheap and highly cost effective. We tend to reflexively keep these receivers turned off, so it may take some adjustment to your daily routine before you start noticing the benefits of keeping them activated, but scientists confirm that it takes very little practice before keeping them always-on becomes routine.

Comment Reverse Aging (Score 3, Funny) 34

But it is likely that the cumulative experience of the pandemic -- including psychological stress, social isolation, disruptions in daily life, reduced activity and wellness -- contributed to the observed changes...

My brain have have reversed in age during the pandemic:

1) Psychological stress. I have never been happier in my entire adult life as I was during the pandemic. Working from home became the accepted norm. I didn't have to deal with shitty workplace offices (they are all shitty, without exception). I got to watch my kids grow, rather than only witnessing a small sliver of it. My wife and I got much more time with each other, which let us bond more than we had ever been able to bond in the past. Online shopping became the norm, etc. My stress level went down by an order of magnitude. My entire family got COVID, were bed-ridden for a day or two, then recovered like nothing happened. I hadn't slept that well in years, and my wife and I were supposed to be in the high-risk of death category. The pandemic years were the best years of my entire adult life, and they ended all too soon.

2) Social isolation: I was able to get away from people in general. Talk about mental rejuvenation! I had my wife and kids with me, which is all the socialization I need and want. I had the Internet for entertainment and education, and whatever socialization I wanted. Better yet, I could end socialization as needed and wanted. I was able to measure out what little socialization I wanted, and end it when I had enough. It was great.

3) Disruptions In Daily Life: Daily life requires all the things I don't want, so changing it was highly welcome. My stress level (and blood pressure) went way down during the pandemic. The worse part of the disruption was when it ended. Going back to daily life has raised my stress level (and my blood pressure) again.

4) Reduced Activity And Wellness: I lost 40 pounds during the pandemic due to increased and regular exercise, and due to greatly reduced stress. My blood pressure went down, my bonding with my family increased, and every metric of wellness I can think of improved (including my blood lipids). They were the golden years of middle-aged wellness.

If these are the markers for brain aging, my brain must have reversed aging by a few years. Bring on the next pandemic!

Comment Re:So pre-market testing was thorough then (Score 3, Insightful) 85

This is more a workplace safety/OSHA issue than a product issue.

Then it gets into your food. Chemical pesticides are unequivocally bad. All of them. I don't care what the corrupt oversight agencies say, all chemical pesticides are inherently dangerous. The best pesticides are natural pesticides: animals.

Comment Re:questions about use (Score 1) 58

...using AI for copy-editing is no different from using a human-based writing service to fix poor language.

I disagree. The human can reason through bad logic, while the LLM merely chooses the most statistically likely arrangement of tokens without regard to whether the arrangement is reasonable.

Even if the LLM usually arrives at the correct token sequences much of the time, it will make you lazy and error prone as time goes on. The inevitable result is that your own error rate will go up over time.

Comment No Shit. (Score 1) 51

There is no such thing as AI in the current era, or ever with digital computers. There is only pattern matching, regardless of how advanced it may seem. It is still advanced pattern matching, and nothing more.

Results like this are to be expected, and should never be a cause for alarm or confusion. This is the inevitable result of trying to make a pattern matching system appear to reason.

Slashdot Top Deals

Do you suffer painful elimination? -- Don Knuth, "Structured Programming with Gotos"

Working...