Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:haha contrariness (Score 2) 182

Not really. It makes no sense near the equator, you're correct. The day length doesn't really change much so no point playing with the clocks. But near the poles, the day length changes too much. You can't save daylight that isn't there - and don't need to save daylight when you've got more than you could ever use.

Comment Re:Not another Challenger incident (Score 2) 44

Not really either. The astronauts were stuck on the ISS, which is designed for long-term occupation. As long as they can get (unmanned) supply missions, they can remain there indefinitely. The Space Shuttle was not designed to remain in space for an extended time, nor to be resupplied in orbit, meaning that being unable to safely return to Earth is a very difficult situation to deal with.

Comment Re:Induce Laron syndrome (Score 1) 105

Not surprising really. Laron Syndrome seems to have a number of other effects which are rather undesirable - "obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, micropenis, low blood sugar".

My comment was suggesting that we should create hobbits - who don't seem to have any obesity problems despite eating six meals a day, and also seem to have rather robust general health despite the low-tech environment and presumed lack of advanced medical treatment in the Shire. The substantial resistance to demon-possessed magic rings probably just follows from general robustness, but fortunately we don't have to worry about that issue (or do we?).

Comment Re:Make people shorter next! (Score 2) 105

I don't think the technology is there yet, but it's not a bad idea. While you're genetically engineering short people, you could also engineer out obesity - not only removing the need for drugs but allowing them to eat six meals a day without gaining weight. If you can beef up the lungs, that should allow risk-free smoking. The real challenge is to strengthen the brain, in case of magic rings containing demons...

Comment Re:Wrong solution. (Score 1) 32

So are you saying that no business should be allowed to have more than one million customers? If you're operating an online retailer, you can't really avoid storing the name, address, and contact details for each customer, and a password for them to log in - otherwise, how do they log in, and get a parcel delivered? And if you have 34 million customers, you have 34 million people's personal data.

Comment Re:Much as I enjoy mocking Russia... (Score 1) 77

Surely the obvious thing to do, if it's important to keep launching to the ISS, is to move one of the cabins from another site? The article mentions two being recently built. That would take the other site out of action, but it's a question of which site is more important.

Comment Re:The great thing (Score 2) 50

No you don't. Take a map at the start of the store and look up where you're going. Look for the (marked and signed) shortcuts. And don't be afraid to walk against the arrows if the shortcut is just past your section rather than before it. Yes, they'd like you to follow the arrows and walk round the whole store, but you don't have to.

Comment Re:Ah, preview! (Score 3, Interesting) 49

It doesn't "run code". It doesn't need to.
It's not a new issue, just a new instance of it. If you have a file that contains external resources, such as HTML, to preview it you need to load the external resources. Which isn't a vulnerability in itself, but allows you to initiate a new network access request without user action. And Windows will helpfully attempt to log in to the random external server with the username and password of the current local user, which is the real vulnerability.
And the password is hashed, but that provides no real security - the hash effectively is the password and is sent in plain text on the wire.

Slashdot Top Deals

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...