Nice paranoiac rant, rain man.

What a joke, clearly this is a data mining project to track down people who spilled the beans before they committed crimes (or any act). The "time traveler" bullshit is just a cover story for the technology.

Electric arcs are more than adequate to pull material off a planet and into its own orbital trajectory.

Chicxulub was not formed by a rock hitting Earth but by a massive electric discharge. Where we find falling rocks from space we don't find craters, where we find craters we don't find rocks fallen from space. Craters are not caused by rocks falling from space. Learn more at thunderbolts dot info.

Are you suggesting the space station has no data connection with the ground?

I believe this is correct, it is a weakly disguised weapons platform and surveillance apparatus.

So they "responded" by saying "no comment". Dumb fuck!

Wow spaz obsess much about flying cars?

Same here in my beat-up 2004, looks like shit but gets in excess of 35mpg consistently, can't drive stupid though, speed limit or less all the way.

puts people, not ours people

You're all talking out your fucking assess, emphatically YES technology ours people out of work, as it should. We want fewer jobs, not MORE jobs.

Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were charts and images, 2 were the elaborate idea that a computer generated cartoon showing the sun in galactic arms during what are believed to have been extinction events somehow proves the assumption that "impacts" not only cause craters but that those craters also caused mass extinctions. While it is true that evidence suggests some craters' origins coincide with some extinctions, the evidence does not suggest those craters were caused by falling rocks from space. Overwhelmingly the evidence shows these craters were caused by electric discharge.

Out of 10 pages, 1 was title and abstract, 1 was references, 2 were images and charts, 2 were the elaborate claim that a cartoon they made on a computer places the sun in a galactic arm during periods believed to be mass extinctions which they quite spuriously attribute to "impacts". While evidence does suggest some historical extinctions correlate with known craters, the evidence does not suggest that these craters were caused by impacts. Overwhelmingly these craters are shown to have been caused by electric discharge.

This seems to be another case of science confirming what successful people already know. It's worth comparing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to that of a typical office suite.