Came looking for this comment. I haven't looked at the algorithm but to me it's a glaring omission that the summary doesn't link to it. The intellectually honest and interested reader is invited to read and report back.

I didn't think I was giving it an impossible task. How was I to know it would go dark?

In case you have access, how do you think this upcoming LLM will influence or change the way we currently use language models?

Right to privacy of action? I never heard of that phrase but I obviously do. What good is privacy if it does cover action? Money is money. I don't claim it to be anything else. Public obligations? Of what sort?

If so, you should support tools that help you live a private life, free from oversight by governments and corporations. Privacy is effectively illegal today. Stories like this are part of your ongoing education to that fact.

Non-custodial is a good step but the wallet needs to be free software if it's going to be more than a shiny toy that quickly loses its luster.

Experience tells me most users are going to switch to another centralized platform because it's not YouTube and it's not Vimeo but they can put an end to this cycle by hosting videos on federated FOSS like PeerTube. Yes, those can go commercial as well but for the bigger concerns, it's not hard to setup an instance and host all of your own video.

Maybe they're going by user numbers? Hard to believe each of the poll options has more than a million users. Slashdot unfortunately is overrun with trolls so I tend to spend less time here than ever. Polls like this as it's discussion section just confirm my decision but I'm glad someone mentioned what I consider the most promising kind of social networking.

Good question. The team behind it made lots of false promises and used the bitcoin.com domain name to attempt to get people to purchase it, thinking they were buying the genuine article. Here, with this article, the scam continues today. It has nothing to do with Bitcoin, and yet its material to FUD BTC.

This article is not about Bitcoin but about another scam with Bitcoin Cash, a fork which has attempted to muddy the waters and trade on the brand for years.

In a world of cheap money, Uber and others should take that money and build out electric vehicle infra. Fast-chargers and company-provided EVs could help make their models work.

Bad for privacy. Centralized. Will never be widely adopted.

Blockchain.com had its day. Best to fuggedaboutit unless they return to community roots and focus on privacy and free open source software.

But you may do it inadvertently or out of habit.

Researchers' emails are in the paper. Let us know what they say!

It's weird how all this concern about energy usage completely ignores the benefits of a decentralized, sovereign currency. Why do people willfully ignore the history of currency?