Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Submission + - Wasserman Schultz won't Speak at Dem Convention After Wikileaks Revelations (cnn.com)

HughPickens.com writes: CNN reports that the head of the Democratic National Committee will not speak at the party's convention next week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, whose stewardship of the DNC has been under fire through most of the presidential primary process, will not have a major speaking role in an effort "to keep the peace" in the party, a Democrat familiar with the decision said. The revelation comes following the release of nearly 20,000 emails. One email appears to show DNC staffers asking how they can reference Bernie Sanders' faith to weaken him in the eyes of Southern voters. Another seems to depict an attorney advising the committee on how to defend Hillary Clinton against an accusation by the Sanders campaign of not living up to a joint fundraising agreement.

Comment Re: XBox 1: jumped shark, shark ate it (Score 1) 108

Bullshit, eh? Do you remember MechAssault? One of the most popular games for the XBox. Online community, many-person gaming via the XBox live servers, worked very well without anything even remotely resembling this kind of hurry-up-and-wait nonsense. Even downloads of new terrain and/or game types (which you chose to do) weren't much of a challenge. The Live interface was much easier to use, too. It was mostly about gaming, not about trying to turn the machine into some kind of Rube Goldberg nightmare.

Next, why should I want to leave a multiplayer game disconnected from the network?

Your position is either that I shouldn't be able to multiplayer-game, or that it's justified that if I do, Microsoft puts a huge time and convenience penalty on the experience, or that there is no significant inconvenience. I don't buy any of those arguments.

Sorry, I've seen the many-hours of no-gaming downside. It's real. It sucks. Not interested.

And hey, did you know MechAssault and MechAssault II both still work offline? I mean, hell, if I have to stay offline in order to keep Microsoft from ruining my day, I might as well do it with one of the most awesome games they ever produced. :)

Comment XBox 1: jumped shark, shark ate it (Score 4, Insightful) 108

No. I've seen the XBox one in action. Hours for updates, insert game, hours more for updates... it's a terrible system.

Sticking with the older gear. Because you can actually play a game when you stick a disk in.

The console makers have completely lost sight of the customer.

Comment Worth a plugged nickle? Doubtful. (Score 5, Insightful) 212

They're pretty late to the party. The fourth amendment has obviously been a "it's just a piece of paper" issue to legislators and the legislation they create since the patriot act was squeezed out of the ass of congress. The rest of the bill of rights hasn't fared much better (3rd amendment excepted.) Lots of other unconstitutional legislation currently in play as well — eminent domain, commerce clause, ex post facto laws, etc. Perhaps I'm just too cynical because of where we are today, but it seems extremely unlikely to me that congress, with or without this... caucus... will get anything done that slows or stops the ongoing government extra-constitutional behaviors.

Comment For non-native speakers and literalists: (Score 1) 523

Well, I am neither brain-damaged nor a native speaker, and it is pretty clear to me that, while he does call the unbalanced comment style "brain-damaged", nowhere did he call *anyone*, not even those who like that style, brain-damaged.

That interpretation requires that comments have brains. They don't. So this particular remark can reasonably be read to impugn the author of the comments. However, it's also extremely likely that this is a case of hyperbole; in which case smiles are called for, not outrage.

Yes, English is annoying. Linus can be, too. :)

Comment Re:Being "that guy" (Score 1) 496

Not famliar with "rMorf"; Google can't seem to find anything prior to the 2000's about it, and the archives Google references that I looked at no longer have the files, other than one ZIP that appears to be defective. What's the history of rMorf?

As far as I know as of right now, first to market for desktop PCs is correct. The original code, which was a freeform point morphing engine, not a grid morpher, was written in early 1986 in 68000 assembler for the Amiga 1000, demonstrated in working form (though with a pretty basic UI) in a dedicated vertical package at the 1986 spring Comdex in Atlanta, in Commodore's Amiga booth (my company was one of Commodore's four featured developers, showing some PCB layout and schematic capture CAD in a showcase section of their Amiga booth... they generously put one of my CAD products in the Amiga software brochure, too, really gave me a terrific "kickstart") to some Commodore execs. In late 1991, in my next company, we began shipping a similar morphing engine for the Amiga within a more extensive image processing system aimed at, and priced for, consumers, written in c. I laid out the basis for the engine on a napkin at lunch in a Dairy Queen during the summer of 1991 and seeing my then-lead programmer's eyes light up), and we shipped a similar product for Windows shortly after that. After I retired, I made the EOL versions of both the Amiga and Windows image processing software (and some other things) freely available on the web. (Amiga / Windows)

Does rMorf predate my 1986 work, and if so, can you provide a reference for me? I'd be very interested to learn that was not first shipping package for an actual desktop PC. It's certainly possible, it's just news to me, and I'd need to rewrite some of my memoirs -- so I'd really like to know. :)

Slashdot Top Deals

All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.