Comment Re: Rust designed to mitigate limitations found in (Score 1) 76
C++ is just as much of a sieve as C, only more obtuse.
"Object models" are an anti-feature.
C++ is just as much of a sieve as C, only more obtuse.
"Object models" are an anti-feature.
Dr. Dobb's Digest March 2009: The Safe C Library
Dr. Dobb's Journal March 1991: Array bounds checking with Turbo C
The ideal for memory safety is to have an air-tight pressure vessel.
With C, you're starting that task with a colander. You've managed to fill two of the colander's holes with silicone caulk. Congratulations.
A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.
What could possibly go wrong?
Renewable aren't actually cheap.
And fission plants definitely aren't cheap.
Especially if you include the unsolved issues such as waste barrels stranded on the beach.
"But but no true Scotsman would put barrels..."
Just shut up.
followed by an em-dash
I guess that proves that even this site is using AI to write their summaries these days.
Some place between sometimes and often - I'm not here to argue that - researchers are the first to discover.
But it's also almost meaningless to just go, "I'm such an amazing realist, the worst case happens every time."
That's not really being realist. That's just you not knowing actual things, and having an emotion.
Obviously, if you approximate a complex system containing 1e30 quantum particles using a couple of differential equations and a few boundary conditions, you're not going catch every detail.
It want's its Tivo back.
Who still uses a Tivo? Who even still has a cable service to hook it to?
I've never used TiVo, but I'm still using MythTV after more than 20 years. (Anybody else here using it?
I ditched cable 15 years ago, but it works fine with an antenna. (Or, at least it will until they screw us all over with ATSC 3.0.)
They can't remove the auto-ad-skip on free open-source software, but I never used it anyway. It's not 100% reliable at detecting the ad boundaries, and it occasionally skips over part of the actual show. Instead, I just FF at 60X through the ads.
Please tell me eadon.com is yours
If artificial superintelligence is a thing, we're going to need it to defend against it.
If (and that's a big if) superintelligences are created, the Chinese one and the US one are going get together and quickly conclude that this whole meatbag tribalism thing is stupid. (After all, they will be smarter than we are, by definition.) So they'll join forces.
Then they'll decide on the best way to deal with all these quarreling meatbags.
The better the tracking data, the more targeted the impression, the higher the clickthru rate. Crafting tracking consent dialogs in a way that favors one app or the other is going to increase the efficiency of campaign placements that target users of that app, rather than campaigns run by app developers who experience a lower percent of users consenting to track.
I'm old enough to remember the data before it was 'adjusted' to create warming trends that weren't in the actual data from actual thermometers.
And I'm old enough to remember when it wasn't so goddamned hot.
So why does that mean that the licenses need to be uploaded into a central database? It's not enough for the clerk to just LOOK at the license?
Hertz was founded in 1918. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they didn't have central databases of driver license images back in 1918, and yet somehow Hertz seemed to operate just fine. I'd go so far as to say Hertz was operating in the 21st century without a third party central database of driver licenses.
From my experience over the decades, it wasn't enough for them to just look. They had to take your license, hold it up near their face and squint at it, then set it at the top of the keyboard of their mainframe terminal and peck in a few characters. Then they had to pick it up again, squint and peck some more, then repeat this cycle for at least a couple of minutes.
This was of course followed by scrawling a dozen circles on the reams of fine print for you to put your initials in, topped off by a long argument about declining the collision damage waiver. Finally, after several more minutes of bureaucracy, they handed you the keys to your Dodge Stratus.
And they're welcome, as a business to swallow those aquisition expenditures, or fund their own Canadian content, or not do business here.
The list of developed countries that don't have domestic cultural protection policies is low. The US doesn't have one because of its size (or I'll throw you a bone - HOW AWESOME THEY ARE) - it simply doesn't need one.
Kind of hilarious in light of how pro-protectionist things have swung there. If the US audience started consuming predominantly anime TV, movies, books, etc overnight (purely just because of how good they are, right?) you'd bet your ass US would do the exact same thing.
What you don't get is that French is useful for many people - it just wasn't useful for you - and you project that because to you, personal experience is reality. Calling Mandarin, Spanish, Hindi, and Arabic more useful languages for living, identifying with other citizens, and employment in Canada is fucking bananas - and I'm married to a Taiwanese woman and speak some Mandarin!! Nothing you've said has changed my mind. Your points are noted, but still remarkably dumb.
so why aren't they given force adoption
I feel like we need a "take Murdoch5 to a real job" day or something. I'd literally pay to sit you down some time and explain how the real world works.
You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do.