I concede that I have not viewed incest-themed video games, as sexually explicit works do not appeal to me. However, US law classifies a video game as an audiovisual work, little different from a motion picture. I'm aware of more than one film adaptation of Lolita, a novel by Vladimir Nabokov depicting sexual abuse of a minor. I'm not aware of any statute or regulation that disqualifies a work of authorship from having "artistic value" solely because it is interactive. Could you give me something to cite about categorical exclusion of interactive audiovisual works from having "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value" per the Miller test?

The conviction was reversed and remanded. From Wikipedia's article "Miller v. California, section "Opinion of the Court":

The result of the ruling was that the Supreme Court overturned Miller's criminal conviction and remanded the case back to the California Superior Court for reconsideration of whether Miller had committed a misdemeanor.[5]

[5] Beverly G. Miller, Miller v. California: A Cold Shower for the First Amendment , 48 St. John's L. Rev. 568 (1974).

From the opinion of the Court, 413 U.S. 15 (1973):

The judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court, Orange County, California, is vacated and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the First Amendment standards established by this opinion.

Could you give me something to cite about Miller's conviction having been upheld on remand?

I quoted the part of the Miller test on which authors and publishers would most likely rely in a defense. The Miller test is not like the fair use test in the copyright statute (17 USC 107), in which the judge is expected to weigh the factors against one another. A work has to meet all three parts of the Miller test to be obscene.

This is where we disagree on how the opinion of the Court ought to be interpreted.

Including the DNS transaction, the public IP address of the server, and the SNI field of ClientHello?

I've noticed that a lot of these US-based PCB fabs that offer manufacturing have a limited selection of board thicknesses, such as 1.6 mm and little else. That doesn't help if you're interfacing with another device that needs a 1.2 mm thick PCB, such as a Nintendo Entertainment System Control Deck.

The law specifically requires "age discrimination" through the concept of a "status offense." My country recognizes age as a protected class only in very limited cases, mostly those involving employment of people over 40.

Because not enough Americans have called their Representative in support of H.R. 987 and their Senators in support of S. 401. These bills, collectively the "Fair Access to Banking Act", would do much as you suggest.

Or at least this was the case until Visa bought Authorize.net.

Laws banning depictions of incest are unconstitutional under Miller v. California if said depictions have serious artistic value. This is true under both current state law and the proposed interstate definition of obscenity.

True. Regulators would need to pick a GUI API stack as the baseline for interoperability, much as regulators picked POSIX.1 stack back in the day. I'd even be fine with a regulation that requires an OS publisher to support "either X11 or Wayland" because applications meant for one can run in the other through XWayland or Weston, as can apps made for the subset of Win32 supported by Winelib.

The included Music app plays music that was synchronized onto the phone using either Finder for macOS or iTunes for Windows. Apps other than the included Music app play music loaded onto the phone as files, such as through libimobiledevice for Linux, but these songs can't be part of the same playlist as music rented from Apple Music. Combining purchased and rented music in a playlist is a big sticking point for my roommate.

That's a lot of CDs to buy and store, especially when a relative's letting her use an Apple Music subscription without charge.

Free streaming services behave more like noninteractive radio than like an interactive jukebox. All playlists are shuffled. This is because copyright law in my country (USA) provides for a cheaper performance royalty for qualifying noninteractive services.

Say I've extracted her playlist as a list of artists and titles. Right now, Amazon appears to have a monopoly on selling lawful DRM-free downloads of major-label music over the web. Google closed its store years ago when rebranding its rental service as "YouTube Music", and Apple's store has always run in a proprietary native application, not the web. So it's either enrich Jeff Bezos or "No, I'm not buying two thousand dollars of used CDs just to be able to use that Linux thing you keep talking about."

Which device might that be that operates on the major cellular networks in the USA? I've read takes that one doesn't meaningfully own an Android-powered phone in the same sense that one doesn't meaningfully own an iPhone. In the interest of reliability, Google has been locking down Android tighter and tighter over the years since Android 10 changed W^X behavior so as to break (for example) Termux.

Here's an idea: All graphical operating systems published by gatekeeper-class companies (as defined in the Digital Markets Act or foreign counterparts) would need to support, at minimum, some specific GUI API for developing local applications. For comparison, the US government used to require POSIX compliance. Microsoft delivered the bare minimum POSIX support in Windows NT versions 3.1 through 4.0, though initially not enough to be practically useful because it lacked networking and graphics.

How would one go about building the FOSS alternative to Apple Mobile Device Service, the component of iTunes that synchronizes music into the Music app of an iPhone? That's probably the biggest thing keeping my roommate on Windows. She wants to play purchased songs (ripped from a CD or purchased on Bandcamp or Itch.io) and rented songs (from her Apple Music family plan) in the same playlist. Because Apple Mobile Device Service is a driver, Wine doesn't run it properly. Last I checked, libimobiledevice for Linux could write files but not the music database used by the Music app, and VLC could play purchased songs stored as files but not rented songs.

Most Windows licenses included with laptop computers sold in major big-box electronics chains are not Pro.

Wine runs user-mode applications. It does not run kernel-mode drivers.

Such a law would have to be very carefully written so as to distinguish between "bots" and assistive technologies used by human beings with disabilities. I can't think of where to draw a bright line.