
Banning the possession of firearms by civilians will ensure that only tyrants and criminals will have them.
Not only that, but what a dangerous precedent! The right to bare arms is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. If the precedent is set for overturning that, what happens next? The freedom of press dies? Right to assembly gone? Illegal search/seizure free for all? State sponsored religion?
We have a right to militia and bare arms so that when/if We The People decide the only way to affect change in our government is through violence, we have the means to do so.
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that
unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of
my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and
an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the
money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its
reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until
all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic
is destroyed."
-- U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864
(letter to Col. William F. Elkins)
Ref: The Lincoln Encyclopedia, Archer H. Shaw
(Macmillan, 1950, NY)
After yesterday's leak, they may as well dump the whole shebang. IMHO: "A list of stuff that people can blow up if they want to screw with us", is something that legitimately deserves to be hidden from everyone but the guy dispatching people to guard that stuff.
2.5 MILLION people had access to these cables, and supposedly, a PRIVATE is responsible for leaking them to Wikileaks.
Who's to say someone else hasn't already leaked this particular cable to AlQaeda? I think the reason people should be outraged is that all this sensitive information was shared with so many needlessly.
That being said, now thanks to Wikileaks, I have a list of locations to stay away from!
zOMG....you just released classified information and put *countless* lives at risk! Prepare to be DDoS'd!
Matter will be damaged in direct proportion to its value.