Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment New jobs? (Score 2) 93

Back in the seventies and eighties, as automation was hitting hard, and offshoring beginning, the talk was all about how everyone would get newer, better jobs in the "information economy".
They at least could point to something.

Now? They have *nothing* at all, and "we'll have fewer people, but other companies will pick up the slack" ... said by every one of them.

Comment Greed is the point (Score 5, Informative) 84

Maybe some of you are old enough to remember payphones. As a kid, they were a dime. Then a quarter. Then $0.50.

Twenty-one years ago, my soon-to-be late ex was in jail in Brevard Co, FL for terrorism (yes, I married a terrorist).

It's a proven *fact* that the more contact prisoners have with the outside, the lower the recidivism rate. But not only were the calls EXPENSIVE (trying to remember if it was $50/mo, or more). But also, there were only certain numbers - actually, I think it was one number - that they could get calls from, and landlines only.

A lot of prisoners got zip.

Comment Re:Pass the popcorn (Score 1) 21

Sure. But then, I'm not (a PoS, who doesn't care about the company, about the customers, or have any clue whatsoever about what the company does), who's only interested in how much money I can extract from the company.

Oldie but goody: from 1995, Robet Reich asked "what does a CEO do that a company president *doesn't* do that makes them worth 10 times the company president's salary?

Comment Wonder why... (Score 1) 30

Just because instead of hiring tons of new grads to crank out code, they can run an AI to write *worse* code in less time, and not complain about working, oh, 119 hours/week.

Yes, a co-worker in 1995 at Ameritech *did* do that (he was working for another company a year later).

Slashdot Top Deals

Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.

Working...