So, you're saying that the point of cars and trains was to profit off of the destruction of the horse industry? That doesn't make much sense.
What you said there makes no sense at all in light of what I said in response to what you said. You really need to work on learning English.
It is not, it's what is lived with in a codebase, C has nothing to do with it. Also, there is nothing about an approach mandated by one language that cannot be implemented in C, Rust creators have not made anything that kernel developers cannot otherwise do.
C has everything to do with it. C requires that programmers be infallible. They're not. They never have been. They never will be.
Rust's designers understand that programmers are human and will always make mistakes so the language allows and even requires building safe zero-cost abstractions that allow the compiler to check for huge swathes of common mistakes. Rust isn't the first language to do that, by any means, but it's the first language that (a) does it consistently and thoroughly (C++ fails this test), (b) is efficient enough for low-level system and kernel coding (managed-runtime languages fail this test) and (c) has achieved sufficiently-broad adoption (many niche languages fail this test).
It's so cute that you think that makes your case for you. Is this just another thing you claim to be doing but aren't, like when you said you were a plant science expert but couldn't manage to figure out that mature forests sequester more CO2?
They need to block the AI slop entirely and ban the frauds posting it.
They're not even going to be able to detect it reliably, nor avoid false positives. It's also not all fraud. Also as sibling points out, ALL content is profitable for them, AI or not.
If you've got the AI tools to tell you how you screwed up with C, why do you need Rust? Just fix what the LLM says you broke. Now you have the speed of C without the bugs. It ought to be easy to find that class of error, right?
It's a misunderstanding at best, though. The work doesn't have to happen for the CEOs to get richer. They count their ends while walking away from a burning dumpster. They don't know how the work gets done because they don't need to know, it's not relevant to their enrichment.
I would reserve "AI Psychosis" to people whose behavior resembles something like schizophrenia.
So like Peter Theil being happy to usher in our replacement? He's willfully attempting to destroy literally all of humanity...
Street Preacher ain't got nothing on Wall Street.
"All the time? Low overhang speeds + fan with overhang. Not tricky."
If you have printed parts with horizontal holes which were not relieved on top, and you printed them in PETG, then you either had sag, or poor layer adhesion due to insufficient temperature. That's a huge percentage of why people still print in PLA. (Another big part is that it's so much cheaper than PHA.)
Also, things can have been getting better overall but it can also be unsustainable.
Now do Paul...
Sure, peter, paul, almond joy, whatever.
But yeah, Saul of Tarsus definitely picked up Christianity and ran off with it, he completely changed its nature. And modern "Christians" often celebrate his attack on their faith. Sad, but then, what about religion isn't sad?
That's not the reason that both bombs were dropped.
You're right, we did it for science, because we are the inspiration for the Nazis and we didn't want to let the Axis be the only monsters in the war.
I've never experienced any sort of "sagging" with PETG, and honestly don't even know what you mean by that
You've never printed anything with a horizontal hole?
To get PLA to be "tough" (impact resistant) on the order of PETG you have to load it up with PU microplastics, which makes it worse for the environment than PETG so you lose that advantage.
So what? Your average colored PLA has additives in it anyway.
And it gets rid of its stiffness
It reduces it, it doesn't eliminate it. Try actually printing some PLA+.
I'm no highly respected scholar on the middle east like you clearly are but a nuclear-armed terrorist-state doesn't tickle my happy places.
OK, but enough about the US and Israel. Iran is not and never has been a nuclear power. The US nuked Japan twice just because it would be a shame not to use both bombs.
Trump shit all over that with his staggering incompetence.
That's one way to look at it. Another is that this is what Russia wants.
Real Users are afraid they'll break the machine -- but they're never afraid to break your face.
