..it's one thing to charge users an access fee, another to charge the ISP, potentially passing the cost on to all the ISPs subscribers whether they're interested in the content or not.
Ironically, the issue came to fore in a complaint from the The American Cable Association (ACA) to the FCC. A quoted ACA press release warns
"Media giants are in the early stages of becoming Internet gatekeepers by requiring broadband providers to pay for their Web-based content and services and include them as part of basic Internet access for all subscribers. These content providers are also preventing subscribers who are interested in the content from independently accessing it on broadband networks of providers that have refused to pay."
So is this a real threat to net neutrality (and the end-to-end principle) or just another bad business model that doesn't stand a chance?
Acknowledging difference is different than racism - while there are small differences between races, our mental plasticity as humans makes it unlikely that any race is significantly different mentally than any other, and really race is an artificial distinction... We're all human, and racism is hate speech, not free speech
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.