Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment We use Verilog, and I recommend it. (Score 1) 301

At the university I teach at (Michigan Tech), we have selected Verilog design for our Altera FPGAs, and have been using it for 5+ years. I used Verilog in private industry before I started teaching and it *seemed* to be more common at that time. When I did some time at IBM back around 1998, they were using VHDL. One of the companies that hires a lot of our grads uses VHDL, and I keep having to tell students, "Look, if you know Verilog, all you need to get a handle on is the syntax of VHDL. Tell them that!"

Knowing both, I find students struggle enough with the concepts of logic design and simulation when they have a familiar kind of syntax (the C-based syntax of Verilog), let alone adding the complexity of VHDL's strange ADA-based syntax. I suggest Verilog.

Comment Re:Hmmm ... (Score 3, Insightful) 416

Apple may set their own standards, but then the standards get opened up. Firewire-- Apple standard, opened up as IEE 1394. Rendezvous-- Apple standard, open-sourced. The Darwin kernel is open. They encourage open-source developers to help with Darwin and other Unix tools. Heck, that BSD guy is actually working for Apple now. The Cocoa API is a direct descendant of stuff at NeXT. All of the classes still have NS* monikers (NSObject, NSString... etc.).

Yes, a lot of the source is closed. Yes, Apple makes the OS and the hardware. But they're not afraid to open their knowledge up to the world.

Slashdot Top Deals

Debug is human, de-fix divine.

Working...