Comment Re:Does anyone really prefer 16x9 instead of 16x10 (Score 1) 646
You're right... but for the first 50 years of television, they were 4:3. Oops, I think my age is showing. I was born before the advent of HDTV.
You're right... but for the first 50 years of television, they were 4:3. Oops, I think my age is showing. I was born before the advent of HDTV.
Yes, I really meant "16x10". This was the most widely implemented widescreen aspect ratio before the 16x9 craze began a year ago.
The most common instances of 16x10 are the 22" 1680x1050 and the 24" 1920x1200 LCD monitors.
I like widescreen better than "TV" (4:3), but I like 16x10 widescreen better than 16x9 widescreen (too short).
I hate glossy screens, too. But I hate 16x9 computer displays even more.
Why would a corporate notebook PC or desktop LCD/LED monitor need to be 16x9 instead of 16x10?
Does everyone just watch movies all day, every day?
Good luck,
Scott
Term, holidays, term, holidays, till we leave school, and then work, work, work till we die. -- C.S. Lewis