Comment Oops, title got cut off, should be: (Score 1) 1
Amid AI Bans, Microsoft and OpenAI Plan a 'Joyful' Hour of AI for Kids
Submission + - Amid AI Bans, Microsoft & OpenAI Plan a 'Joyful' Hour of AI for Millions of 1
theodp writes: Earlier this month on the heels of announced AI moratoriums by the nation's two largest K-12 school districts (NYC & LA), tech-backed nonprofit CodeAI named OpenAI the 'Lead Partner' for the 2026 Hour of AI, which last year replaced the Hour of Code (RIP, 2013-2024) as the premier event for the nation's K-12 schoolchildren during December's CS Education Week. In August, as it launched ChatGPT for Teens, OpenAI announced a new signature partnership with CodeAI to 'prepare the first AI generation', explaining that 'through the Hour of AI, OpenAI and CodeAI will introduce millions of students to the basics of using AI thoughtfully and responsibly.'
The updated Hour of AI website also listed OpenAI investor and partner Microsoft as one of two 'Supporters' for the Hour of AI. Now, Microsoft is calling all K-12 teachers around the globe to register for What's working now: Making AI literacy joyful for every learner, a Nov. 17th Microsoft Teams webinar at which it will unveil its Minecraft-branded 'Hour of AI experience.'
From the invite: "Discover how AI literacy can be engaging, approachable, and joyful for students. Join Microsoft Elevate for Educators and Minecraft Education to see the new Minecraft Education Hour of AI experience in action and hear practical ideas from educators bringing AI learning into their schools and classrooms." The speakers include the EMEA Marketing Lead for the $4B Microsoft Elevate AI education program, the Head of Marketing for Microsoft Minecraft Education, and a Sr. Learning Content Developer from Microsoft-backed CodeAI.
The updated Hour of AI website also listed OpenAI investor and partner Microsoft as one of two 'Supporters' for the Hour of AI. Now, Microsoft is calling all K-12 teachers around the globe to register for What's working now: Making AI literacy joyful for every learner, a Nov. 17th Microsoft Teams webinar at which it will unveil its Minecraft-branded 'Hour of AI experience.'
From the invite: "Discover how AI literacy can be engaging, approachable, and joyful for students. Join Microsoft Elevate for Educators and Minecraft Education to see the new Minecraft Education Hour of AI experience in action and hear practical ideas from educators bringing AI learning into their schools and classrooms." The speakers include the EMEA Marketing Lead for the $4B Microsoft Elevate AI education program, the Head of Marketing for Microsoft Minecraft Education, and a Sr. Learning Content Developer from Microsoft-backed CodeAI.
Comment From "We Stand by Our People" to "Leave" in a Week (Score 4, Informative) 139
The move comes less than a week after Microsoft President Brad Smith proclaimed 'We stand by our people. We always have. We always will.' (a response to a government investigation into layoffs and the use of foreign workers at the company).
Submission + - An AI Disconnect
theodp writes: Jordyn Holman of the NY Times writes: When it comes to artificial intelligence, chief executives and their work forces aren’t seeing eye to eye. Corporate leaders, increasingly in earnings calls and interviews, tout productivity gains and say they are doing right by their workers as they roll out the technology. But workers are much more concerned about being supplanted, and they don’t trust their company’s executives.
A survey from the Milken Institute-Harris Poll Listening Project recently found that more than two-thirds of business leaders expect they will be better off financially in five years because of A.I., while just 27 percent of the U.S. work force felt the same way — a whopping 41 point gap. Workers also see less A.I. transformation than leadership does. Nearly three-fourths of leaders say A.I. has significantly changed the way work is done, compared with 58 percent of entry and midlevel employees, according to a report released this month from the Wharton School.
“We have corner offices and cubicles, driving the same economy, but living in completely different realities,” John Gerzema, C.E.O. of the Harris Poll, said in an email. “There is a gulf in hope between what leaders think A.I. could bring to companies and what employees feel it is taking away from them.” What might be worse is that C.E.O.s don’t seem to recognize the disconnect, or that they’re losing the trust of their workers.
A survey from the Milken Institute-Harris Poll Listening Project recently found that more than two-thirds of business leaders expect they will be better off financially in five years because of A.I., while just 27 percent of the U.S. work force felt the same way — a whopping 41 point gap. Workers also see less A.I. transformation than leadership does. Nearly three-fourths of leaders say A.I. has significantly changed the way work is done, compared with 58 percent of entry and midlevel employees, according to a report released this month from the Wharton School.
“We have corner offices and cubicles, driving the same economy, but living in completely different realities,” John Gerzema, C.E.O. of the Harris Poll, said in an email. “There is a gulf in hope between what leaders think A.I. could bring to companies and what employees feel it is taking away from them.” What might be worse is that C.E.O.s don’t seem to recognize the disconnect, or that they’re losing the trust of their workers.
Submission + - Microsoft: Nice Pension You Got There. Be a Shame If Something Happened to It. 1
theodp writes: "Last week, I spoke to Microsoft employees about our immigration program," wrote Microsoft President Brad Smith in a Tuesday LinkedIn post (Microsoft was recently suspended from the Green Card program). "In the spirit of transparency and public interest, we are sharing this more broadly."
In the accompanying video, Smith begins: "Hi, everybody. Yes, there was an announcement last week by the administration, and yes, it's really causing us to do a lot of work to focus on what we need to do to really preserve our ability to succeed and protect the people who work here."
Smith concludes by suggesting that what's bad for Microsoft is also bad for U.S. workers' pensions and 401K's: "We contribute to communities across the United States — not just in our jobs, not just in our philanthropy — but perhaps most importantly, we create wealth in every community across this country. [...] Microsoft has $1.2 trillion dollars of stock held by pension funds and index funds in the United States. What does that mean? If you're an employee in the United States who benefits from a pension, let's say you work for the government. You could be a school bus driver or a teacher, a firefighter, or a police officer. You are better off today because of the wealth we have created. If you work for a labor organization, a union that has a pension fund, you could be a carpenter or electrician, a welder or a plumber or a pipe fitter. The same is true for you. In fact, the truth of the matter is you would be hard pressed to find any institution in the history of the United States that has created more wealth for more people across the United States — millions and millions of people."
In the accompanying video, Smith begins: "Hi, everybody. Yes, there was an announcement last week by the administration, and yes, it's really causing us to do a lot of work to focus on what we need to do to really preserve our ability to succeed and protect the people who work here."
Smith concludes by suggesting that what's bad for Microsoft is also bad for U.S. workers' pensions and 401K's: "We contribute to communities across the United States — not just in our jobs, not just in our philanthropy — but perhaps most importantly, we create wealth in every community across this country. [...] Microsoft has $1.2 trillion dollars of stock held by pension funds and index funds in the United States. What does that mean? If you're an employee in the United States who benefits from a pension, let's say you work for the government. You could be a school bus driver or a teacher, a firefighter, or a police officer. You are better off today because of the wealth we have created. If you work for a labor organization, a union that has a pension fund, you could be a carpenter or electrician, a welder or a plumber or a pipe fitter. The same is true for you. In fact, the truth of the matter is you would be hard pressed to find any institution in the history of the United States that has created more wealth for more people across the United States — millions and millions of people."
Submission + - IN Secretary of Education Joins Board of Tech-Backed AI/CS Curriculum Provider
theodp writes: Amid pushback against K-12 AI — including AI moratoriums in the nation's largest school districts (NYC and LA) — tech-backed nonprofit CodeAI issued a press release Friday announcing that Katie Jenner, Indiana Secretary of Education, Joins CodeAI Board of Directors ("The state chief behind one of the country's most ambitious efforts to make AI education foundational brings state-level policy leadership to CodeAI's next chapter.").
From the press release: "Today, CodeAI [known as Code.org before an AI pivot] is proud to welcome one of the country's most effective architects of building the foundations for AI education: Katie Jenner, Indiana Secretary of Education, has joined CodeAI's Board of Directors. AI is already reshaping how students learn, work, and make decisions — often faster than schools can respond. Preparing young people for that world takes more than access to new tools. It takes leaders who can build the policy foundations that let an entire state move. Dr. Jenner's appointment reflects CodeAI's future. As a state chief, she hasn't just advocated for change — she has built the conditions for it, setting the standards, requirements, and accountability that give educators across Indiana the ability to make the AI education foundational for their students. She’s cleared the policy barriers so that teachers throughout the state can build the classrooms students need, and so that every student can develop the digital fluency to understand, direct, question, and create with the technology shaping their lives. [...] Her perspective will help guide CodeAI as the organization scales its work nationally — ensuring that understanding the technology shaping our world doesn't become a privilege of zip code, but a foundation available to every student."
In 2024, Indiana became the 9th state to make CS a high school graduation requirement after Jenner and Code.org rallied support for the legislation. Helping in that effort was Nextech, an Indiana nonprofit that launched in 2015 as an early Code.org regional partner with a "mission to help cultivate tech talent in Indiana by focusing on K-12 students," including introducing Code.org's curriculum into Indiana's classrooms. Following passage of the legislation, Code.org produced a new Indiana-specific Computing Foundations for a Digital Age: Indiana (AI Foundations) course, a pared-down semester-long version of its year-long curriculum that enables Indiana middle and high school kids to fulfill their CS graduation requirement. Nextech and Code.org offer support for the course, and stipends and travel reimbursement are available for teachers who attend in-person professional development for the course. With Jenner's support, Indiana schools were also early adopters of the Khanmigo AI chatbot tutor, participating in a widely-publicized pilot with CodeAI partners Khan Academy and OpenAI.
So, is Indiana's Secretary of Education joining tech-backed CodeAI's Board cause for celebration, or does it raise concerns about the kind of 'corporate capture' of K-12 classrooms explored in Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools?
From the press release: "Today, CodeAI [known as Code.org before an AI pivot] is proud to welcome one of the country's most effective architects of building the foundations for AI education: Katie Jenner, Indiana Secretary of Education, has joined CodeAI's Board of Directors. AI is already reshaping how students learn, work, and make decisions — often faster than schools can respond. Preparing young people for that world takes more than access to new tools. It takes leaders who can build the policy foundations that let an entire state move. Dr. Jenner's appointment reflects CodeAI's future. As a state chief, she hasn't just advocated for change — she has built the conditions for it, setting the standards, requirements, and accountability that give educators across Indiana the ability to make the AI education foundational for their students. She’s cleared the policy barriers so that teachers throughout the state can build the classrooms students need, and so that every student can develop the digital fluency to understand, direct, question, and create with the technology shaping their lives. [...] Her perspective will help guide CodeAI as the organization scales its work nationally — ensuring that understanding the technology shaping our world doesn't become a privilege of zip code, but a foundation available to every student."
In 2024, Indiana became the 9th state to make CS a high school graduation requirement after Jenner and Code.org rallied support for the legislation. Helping in that effort was Nextech, an Indiana nonprofit that launched in 2015 as an early Code.org regional partner with a "mission to help cultivate tech talent in Indiana by focusing on K-12 students," including introducing Code.org's curriculum into Indiana's classrooms. Following passage of the legislation, Code.org produced a new Indiana-specific Computing Foundations for a Digital Age: Indiana (AI Foundations) course, a pared-down semester-long version of its year-long curriculum that enables Indiana middle and high school kids to fulfill their CS graduation requirement. Nextech and Code.org offer support for the course, and stipends and travel reimbursement are available for teachers who attend in-person professional development for the course. With Jenner's support, Indiana schools were also early adopters of the Khanmigo AI chatbot tutor, participating in a widely-publicized pilot with CodeAI partners Khan Academy and OpenAI.
So, is Indiana's Secretary of Education joining tech-backed CodeAI's Board cause for celebration, or does it raise concerns about the kind of 'corporate capture' of K-12 classrooms explored in Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools?
Submission + - Who Killed Grace Hopper?
theodp writes: In Grace Hopper Confab’s Sudden Cancellation Raises Alarm for Women in Tech, the Washington Post's Jeff Green and Emily Flitter write:
"The cancellation of this year’s Grace Hopper Celebration [just GHC in Anaheim; a press release FAQ explains GHC India in Bangalore is still taking place], one of the largest gatherings of women in technology, is the latest example of how the retreat from diversity initiatives is reshaping opportunities for women in tech. For three decades, the conference has drawn tens of thousands of attendees looking for jobs, mentors and professional connections, and provided a platform for tech giants eager to prove their commitment to advancing women. But organizers canceled this month’s event – scheduled to begin Oct. 27 in Anaheim, California – after sponsorships and registrations fell short of what was needed to cover costs. [...] This year’s lineup of sponsors had included heavy-hitters such as Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Nvidia Corp. and Bank of America Corp. It wasn’t immediately clear what led to the shortfall, and organizers declined to comment beyond their statement."
So, any guesses as to 'Who Killed Grace Hopper?' Covid? Mass tech layoffs? AI? Cancelled DEI efforts? Unsustainable cost/funding model? Bad job market (especially early-career), non-AI cost-cutting (including travel and conferences), unwanted male "gate crashers"? All of the above? Other?
"The cancellation of this year’s Grace Hopper Celebration [just GHC in Anaheim; a press release FAQ explains GHC India in Bangalore is still taking place], one of the largest gatherings of women in technology, is the latest example of how the retreat from diversity initiatives is reshaping opportunities for women in tech. For three decades, the conference has drawn tens of thousands of attendees looking for jobs, mentors and professional connections, and provided a platform for tech giants eager to prove their commitment to advancing women. But organizers canceled this month’s event – scheduled to begin Oct. 27 in Anaheim, California – after sponsorships and registrations fell short of what was needed to cover costs. [...] This year’s lineup of sponsors had included heavy-hitters such as Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Nvidia Corp. and Bank of America Corp. It wasn’t immediately clear what led to the shortfall, and organizers declined to comment beyond their statement."
So, any guesses as to 'Who Killed Grace Hopper?' Covid? Mass tech layoffs? AI? Cancelled DEI efforts? Unsustainable cost/funding model? Bad job market (especially early-career), non-AI cost-cutting (including travel and conferences), unwanted male "gate crashers"? All of the above? Other?
Comment Google AI Studio-Generated Playground Shooters (Score 2) 32
My attempt at using Google AI to vibe code a simple basketball-themed elementary school math game took an interesting turn. After asking Google to generate four free-throw shooters for the game, Google AI not only gave me kids who took free throw shots at a playground (with kids in the stands) but also came up with an additional twist of its own. Once the kids released the basketball, they immediately took out a gun and kept firing rounds repeatedly across the court. Tried to prompt Google AI to remove the guns and gunfire but it fell on deaf ears because I got flagged for violating Google's rules and had to manually delete the trigger-happy free throw-shooting kids Google AI had generated to get back in Google's good graces before it would listen to my further prompts! In the end, I was unable to coax a decent game out of it despite a number of attempts. Hoping a promised Unity partnership will improve the game's generated characters, scenery, and physics. It did generate a nice-looking splash screen for the game and some impressive looking 3-D game characters, but none of that made its way into the game (which was about vintage Dr.J Vs Larry Bird One on One-caliber, so perhaps I missed some kind of option/setting.
Comment Ironically, Streetlights Have the Opposite Problem (Score 2) 116
As headlamps have grown brighter, streetlights (and other nighttime lighting for sidewalks, parks, etc. and daytime lighting for tunnels, parking garages, etc.) have grown dimmer and dimmer, presumably largely in response to demand for energy savings and residents' complaints about brightness, in some cases to the point of making the lighting completely ineffective for its intended purposes.
Submission + - ChatGPT, Gemini Call BS on Microsoft's PERM Program Ban 'Comment'
theodp writes: Asked to comment on the merits of the Microsoft Comment on Recent Immigration Questions, which was posted without attribution on the Microsoft On The Issues blog in response to the U.S. Government's suspension of Microsoft, Adobe, and IT outsourcing giants from the Green Card program (PERM), ChatGPT suggested it was a red herring defense at best: "The central issue is whether Microsoft has complied with the requirements governing permanent labor certification, including whether qualified American workers were genuinely considered for positions being offered to foreign workers. Microsoft instead emphasizes that 80% of its H-1B applications involved existing employees rather than new hires. That framing encourages readers to think the government's concern rests on a basic misunderstanding: that the government is counting existing workers as new foreign hires. But that is not necessarily the government's argument. Existing H-1B employees can subsequently be sponsored for permanent residency, and their employers must still comply with the applicable PERM requirements."
Asked to provide a second AI opinion, Google's Gemini agreed: "Microsoft’s response is a classic piece of defensive corporate communication. It successfully highlights true statistics—such as its high median wages and the fact that most H-1B filings are internal extensions—to counter the narrative that it is a low-wage outsourcing shop. However, its statement completely sidesteps the central accusation: that its ongoing sponsorship of thousands of green cards via the PERM program ran afoul of labor regulations while it was concurrently laying off thousands of domestic American workers. By omitting this tension, Microsoft's response answers questions the administration wasn't actually asking while ignoring the underlying compliance and fraud investigations that triggered the freeze."
Microsoft is hardly the only tech giant whose PERM program hiring practices have attracted U.S. government scrutiny. In August 2026, the U.S Dept. of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced a $3.2 million settlement involving OpenAI OpCo LLC and its analytics provider Statsig that addressed allegations of "discriminating against U.S. workers" during the PERM hiring process. And in 2023, Apple was required by the U.S. Dept. of Justice to pay up to $25 million in backpay and civil penalties to "resolve allegations that Apple illegally discriminated in hiring and recruitment against U.S. citizens and certain non-U.S. citizens." And in 2021, Facebook agreed to pay up to $14.25 million to settle civil claims by the U.S. government that the social media company discriminated against American workers and violated federal recruitment rules.
Asked to provide a second AI opinion, Google's Gemini agreed: "Microsoft’s response is a classic piece of defensive corporate communication. It successfully highlights true statistics—such as its high median wages and the fact that most H-1B filings are internal extensions—to counter the narrative that it is a low-wage outsourcing shop. However, its statement completely sidesteps the central accusation: that its ongoing sponsorship of thousands of green cards via the PERM program ran afoul of labor regulations while it was concurrently laying off thousands of domestic American workers. By omitting this tension, Microsoft's response answers questions the administration wasn't actually asking while ignoring the underlying compliance and fraud investigations that triggered the freeze."
Microsoft is hardly the only tech giant whose PERM program hiring practices have attracted U.S. government scrutiny. In August 2026, the U.S Dept. of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced a $3.2 million settlement involving OpenAI OpCo LLC and its analytics provider Statsig that addressed allegations of "discriminating against U.S. workers" during the PERM hiring process. And in 2023, Apple was required by the U.S. Dept. of Justice to pay up to $25 million in backpay and civil penalties to "resolve allegations that Apple illegally discriminated in hiring and recruitment against U.S. citizens and certain non-U.S. citizens." And in 2021, Facebook agreed to pay up to $14.25 million to settle civil claims by the U.S. government that the social media company discriminated against American workers and violated federal recruitment rules.
Submission + - Amid K-12 AI Pushback, OpenAI Named Lead Partner of 'Hour of AI' for Kids
theodp writes: On the heels of announced AI moratoriums by the nation's two largest K-12 school districts (NYC, LA), tech-backed nonprofit CodeAI (aka Code.org) this week named OpenAI 'Lead Partner' for the 2026 Hour of AI, which has replaced the Hour of Code (RIP, 2013-2024) as the premier event for the nation's K-12 schoolchildren during December's CS Education Week. OpenAI investor and partner Microsoft was named as one of two 'Supporters' for the event/infomercial (the other being U.S. defense contractor Northrop Grumman).
In August, as it launched ChatGPT for Teens, OpenAI announced a new signature partnership with Code.org to 'prepare the first AI generation', explaining that 'through the Hour of AI, OpenAI and CodeAI will introduce millions of students to the basics of using AI thoughtfully and responsibly.' OpenAI and Microsoft last year teamed up with the American Federation of Teachers to 'bring AI into the classroom', but that honeymoon is over. For more on the inside story of how Big Tech is applying the same playbook it used to scale coding lessons nationwide to now mainstream their AI tools in schools, check out Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools.
So, much like the Hour of Code that preceded it, will the Hour of AI serve as tech's 'Trojan Horse' (ChatGPT-generated parody cover) in its 'Odyssey' to push its agenda and curriculum into schools?
In August, as it launched ChatGPT for Teens, OpenAI announced a new signature partnership with Code.org to 'prepare the first AI generation', explaining that 'through the Hour of AI, OpenAI and CodeAI will introduce millions of students to the basics of using AI thoughtfully and responsibly.' OpenAI and Microsoft last year teamed up with the American Federation of Teachers to 'bring AI into the classroom', but that honeymoon is over. For more on the inside story of how Big Tech is applying the same playbook it used to scale coding lessons nationwide to now mainstream their AI tools in schools, check out Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools.
So, much like the Hour of Code that preceded it, will the Hour of AI serve as tech's 'Trojan Horse' (ChatGPT-generated parody cover) in its 'Odyssey' to push its agenda and curriculum into schools?
Submission + - OpenAI Named Lead Partner of 'Hour of AI' for K-12 Schoolkids Across the Globe
theodp writes: If you thought the announced AI moratoriums by the nation's two largest K-12 school districts (New York City & Los Angeles) might prompt the tech-backed nonprofit CodeAI to ease up on the K-12 AI accelerator, think again. On Monday, CodeAI unveiled a revamped website for December's Hour of AI, with OpenAI named as the Lead Partner for the event and Microsoft named as one of two 'Supporters' (the other being the aerospace and defense company Northrop Grumman). In August, as it launched ChatGPT for Teens, OpenAI announced a signature partnership with Code.org to 'prepare the first AI generation', adding that 'through the Hour of AI, OpenAI and CodeAI will introduce millions of students to the basics of using AI thoughtfully and responsibly.'
At a Microsoft AI event in August 2025, Microsoft President Brad Smith called on Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi to "switch hats" from coding to AI, setting the stage for Partovi's announcement that the nonprofit would rename the Hour of Code — formerly the premier event for K-12 schoolchildren during CS Education Week since 2013 — to the Hour of AI in 2025 (a month earlier, Microsoft and OpenAI teamed up with the American Federation of Teachers to hatch a plan to 'bring AI into the classroom'). Later in 2025, Microsoft secured a 27% stake in OpenAI's new for-profit entity, which Reuters reported is now eyeing a $1.4 trillion valuation. In mid-2026, Code.org rebranded itself as CodeAI just ahead of the growing pushback against AI in K-12 schools.
The inside story of how Big Tech is applying the same playbook it used to scale coding lessons nationwide to now mainstream their AI tools in schools is at the heart of the new book Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools.
At a Microsoft AI event in August 2025, Microsoft President Brad Smith called on Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi to "switch hats" from coding to AI, setting the stage for Partovi's announcement that the nonprofit would rename the Hour of Code — formerly the premier event for K-12 schoolchildren during CS Education Week since 2013 — to the Hour of AI in 2025 (a month earlier, Microsoft and OpenAI teamed up with the American Federation of Teachers to hatch a plan to 'bring AI into the classroom'). Later in 2025, Microsoft secured a 27% stake in OpenAI's new for-profit entity, which Reuters reported is now eyeing a $1.4 trillion valuation. In mid-2026, Code.org rebranded itself as CodeAI just ahead of the growing pushback against AI in K-12 schools.
The inside story of how Big Tech is applying the same playbook it used to scale coding lessons nationwide to now mainstream their AI tools in schools is at the heart of the new book Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools.
Submission + - The University of Washington at Microsoft
theodp writes: GeekWire reports that the University of Washington has moved its Global Innovation Exchange {GIX) program to Microsoft’s campus in a rent-free deal (UW News release). GIX, an institute supporting tech leaders that offers an MS in Technology Innovation, is the first UW program to set up full-time operations at Microsoft, whose headquarters are just across Lake Washington from the university’s main campus. Microsoft provided a $42 million in-kind donation to establish the embedded facility; the UW is leasing the new 48,500-square-foot GIX space in Microsoft’s Building 92 rent-free. GIX debuted in 2015 as a partnership of the UW and China's Tsinghua University and received $70 million in Microsoft support at the now-abandoned GIX location in Bellevue (the Steve Ballmer Building), although indications are that a long-term arrangement did not come together as intended.
In a Thursday LinkedIn post, Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote: "Last night we opened a door unlike any other. At the heart of Microsoft’s campus, step into the new home of the UW's Global Innovation Exchange (GIX) and you cross from Microsoft into the University of Washington. No one has ever put a great research university and a leading technology company under the same roof quite like this. As far as I know, no one has even tried. The timing matters. Artificial intelligence is advancing fast. The question is whether the people building it understand the world it’s changing. This calls for a new style of education and leadership. We need leaders who understand the technology deeply and see things through other people’s eyes. Leaders who learn by collaborating on real projects with people from different countries and disciplines. That’s what GIX is built for. Students will learn from faculty across the UW, take classes taught by Microsoft employees, and be mentored by people from across our industry here in the Pacific Northwest."
Interestingly, Smith's contention that UW GIX students will benefit from a 'new style' of Microsoft and industry-influenced education sounds a lot like Smith's contention that K-12 school children are better off thanks to a new style of Microsoft and industry-influenced education. In an interview last month, Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools author Natasha Singer told NPR (podcast, transcript), "For my book, I spoke to Brad Smith, who's the president of Microsoft, and he has been one of the leaders in the tech industry pushing for [K-12] computer science [and now AI literacy] in schools. [...] And Brad Smith said, philanthropy in the private sector is doing this work because public schools have failed to do what they were supposed to do. And his view is that public schools should be teaching modern subjects like computer science, and they were not equipped to do it fast enough and the tech industry stepped in to help. And is it better than if schools were able to do this themselves? He said, no, but it's certainly better than nothing. And he said to me, you know, think about where we would be on computer science if the tech industry hadn't stepped up. [...] Well, I've been having this conversation with him for 10 years, and when we started having it 10 years ago, I said to him, I get that, but when big tech companies put their finger on the scale, it tips education in certain ways that not only favor the tech industry but can obscure equally or more important things."
So, is 'The University of Washington at Microsoft' a good or bad idea?
In a Thursday LinkedIn post, Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote: "Last night we opened a door unlike any other. At the heart of Microsoft’s campus, step into the new home of the UW's Global Innovation Exchange (GIX) and you cross from Microsoft into the University of Washington. No one has ever put a great research university and a leading technology company under the same roof quite like this. As far as I know, no one has even tried. The timing matters. Artificial intelligence is advancing fast. The question is whether the people building it understand the world it’s changing. This calls for a new style of education and leadership. We need leaders who understand the technology deeply and see things through other people’s eyes. Leaders who learn by collaborating on real projects with people from different countries and disciplines. That’s what GIX is built for. Students will learn from faculty across the UW, take classes taught by Microsoft employees, and be mentored by people from across our industry here in the Pacific Northwest."
Interestingly, Smith's contention that UW GIX students will benefit from a 'new style' of Microsoft and industry-influenced education sounds a lot like Smith's contention that K-12 school children are better off thanks to a new style of Microsoft and industry-influenced education. In an interview last month, Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools author Natasha Singer told NPR (podcast, transcript), "For my book, I spoke to Brad Smith, who's the president of Microsoft, and he has been one of the leaders in the tech industry pushing for [K-12] computer science [and now AI literacy] in schools. [...] And Brad Smith said, philanthropy in the private sector is doing this work because public schools have failed to do what they were supposed to do. And his view is that public schools should be teaching modern subjects like computer science, and they were not equipped to do it fast enough and the tech industry stepped in to help. And is it better than if schools were able to do this themselves? He said, no, but it's certainly better than nothing. And he said to me, you know, think about where we would be on computer science if the tech industry hadn't stepped up. [...] Well, I've been having this conversation with him for 10 years, and when we started having it 10 years ago, I said to him, I get that, but when big tech companies put their finger on the scale, it tips education in certain ways that not only favor the tech industry but can obscure equally or more important things."
So, is 'The University of Washington at Microsoft' a good or bad idea?
Submission + - Too Big to Fail? What Happens if the AI Bubble Bursts
theodp writes: Financial journalist Bethany McLean ponders What Happens if the A.I. Bubble Bursts (NYT, alt. source) in a NY Times op-ed. McLean, whose earlier reporting on Enron (YouTube) led to the downfall of the company and its auditor Arthur Andersen, begins:
It was about a year ago that Sarah Friar, the chief financial officer of OpenAI, said one way the company might sustain its current financial high-wire act was with a “backstop” or “guarantee” — as in, a government guarantee — “that allows the financing to happen.” Almost at the same time, Sam Altman, the company’s chief executive, said, “Given the magnitude of what I expect A.I.’s economic impact to look like,” the government should serve the role of “insurer of last resort.” They qualified those comments, but still, the gist seemed to be that the industry The Wall Street Journal calls “the biggest economic bet in U.S. history” is so important to the nation that if it needs more funding, taxpayers should be on the hook. Another way to put it is that the government should regard artificial intelligence the same way it regarded the banks in the 2008 financial crisis: too big to fail.
It’s hard to reconcile that suggestion with the other message blaring out of leading A.I. companies these days: that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade,” as the former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently warned, and must therefore be restrained. A.I. is so important that we can’t let it fail, but so risky that we shouldn’t let it go forward? Now add the conventional wisdom that the United States has to beat China at all costs (or as President Trump put it, “Whoever wins A.I. wins!”), and the arguments can start to reinforce one another. The more the race to dominate becomes existential, the more we have to spend on it; the more we spend on the industry, the more economically and geopolitically consequential it becomes; the more consequential it becomes, the greater the need to speed ahead, safety concerns be damned; the more we race ahead heedless, the more risk there is. All in all, it raises an even scarier possibility: What if rather than being too big to fail, A.I. is too big to stop?
She concludes:
This technology may be critical to the future of the United States, but preserving it doesn’t mean we have to bail out the private entities that are leading the field at this particular moment, nor does it mean we have to protect the fortunes of their investors and executives. The solution to the whole ever-expanding A.I. terror starts with remembering the lessons of the 2008 crisis: No company should be too big to fail.
It was about a year ago that Sarah Friar, the chief financial officer of OpenAI, said one way the company might sustain its current financial high-wire act was with a “backstop” or “guarantee” — as in, a government guarantee — “that allows the financing to happen.” Almost at the same time, Sam Altman, the company’s chief executive, said, “Given the magnitude of what I expect A.I.’s economic impact to look like,” the government should serve the role of “insurer of last resort.” They qualified those comments, but still, the gist seemed to be that the industry The Wall Street Journal calls “the biggest economic bet in U.S. history” is so important to the nation that if it needs more funding, taxpayers should be on the hook. Another way to put it is that the government should regard artificial intelligence the same way it regarded the banks in the 2008 financial crisis: too big to fail.
It’s hard to reconcile that suggestion with the other message blaring out of leading A.I. companies these days: that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade,” as the former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently warned, and must therefore be restrained. A.I. is so important that we can’t let it fail, but so risky that we shouldn’t let it go forward? Now add the conventional wisdom that the United States has to beat China at all costs (or as President Trump put it, “Whoever wins A.I. wins!”), and the arguments can start to reinforce one another. The more the race to dominate becomes existential, the more we have to spend on it; the more we spend on the industry, the more economically and geopolitically consequential it becomes; the more consequential it becomes, the greater the need to speed ahead, safety concerns be damned; the more we race ahead heedless, the more risk there is. All in all, it raises an even scarier possibility: What if rather than being too big to fail, A.I. is too big to stop?
She concludes:
This technology may be critical to the future of the United States, but preserving it doesn’t mean we have to bail out the private entities that are leading the field at this particular moment, nor does it mean we have to protect the fortunes of their investors and executives. The solution to the whole ever-expanding A.I. terror starts with remembering the lessons of the 2008 crisis: No company should be too big to fail.
Submission + - Put Multiple Values in One Cell with Lists and Arrays in Excel 1
theodp writes: Folks in Finance and other power Excel users were no doubt all atwitter over Microsoft's Thursday announcement of support for in-cell lists and arrays in Excel, including four new functions — FLATTEN, HAS, HASANY, HASALL — to manipulate them. From the home office in Redmond:
"Throughout Excel's 40-year history, you've only been able to put one value per cell. In this announcement, we're excited to share how that's changing with the release of lists, arrays in cells, and nested arrays, initially to Microsoft Excel for Windows and Mac Beta Channels. Many workbooks already try to pack multiple values into one cell. A project might list 'Carlos, Henrietta, Jacob' as three owners, or a Forms survey might return '2:00 PM; 2:30 PM; 3:00 PM' as one response. With lists, you can keep those values in one cell, while also keeping them separate for filtering, calculation and more."
If you haven't been keeping abreast of What's New in Excel, Microsoft has added a number of new features over the past years that enable Excel users to do things one might formerly have turned to programming languages and other computing environments to accomplish, including support for regular expressions, the LET and LAMDA functions, Python in Excel, and, of course, the obligatory AI support.
Which raises an interesting question: Is an Excel formula worth a thousand lines of AI-generated Python code? (especially if the latter is run in an overengineered infrastructure, such as an AI-generated complex CI/CD pipeline combined with cloud pipeline execution!)
"Throughout Excel's 40-year history, you've only been able to put one value per cell. In this announcement, we're excited to share how that's changing with the release of lists, arrays in cells, and nested arrays, initially to Microsoft Excel for Windows and Mac Beta Channels. Many workbooks already try to pack multiple values into one cell. A project might list 'Carlos, Henrietta, Jacob' as three owners, or a Forms survey might return '2:00 PM; 2:30 PM; 3:00 PM' as one response. With lists, you can keep those values in one cell, while also keeping them separate for filtering, calculation and more."
If you haven't been keeping abreast of What's New in Excel, Microsoft has added a number of new features over the past years that enable Excel users to do things one might formerly have turned to programming languages and other computing environments to accomplish, including support for regular expressions, the LET and LAMDA functions, Python in Excel, and, of course, the obligatory AI support.
Which raises an interesting question: Is an Excel formula worth a thousand lines of AI-generated Python code? (especially if the latter is run in an overengineered infrastructure, such as an AI-generated complex CI/CD pipeline combined with cloud pipeline execution!)
