Who paid for this?

Best not be a federal grant. If out of regular tuition or their enfoement, fine. Otherwise, wtf pid for such a useless study as chefs (and, samurai)already knew thisâ¦dull blades don't slice cleanly, they cut and crush.

3 years? I thought Musk said 6 weeks to rewrite the system in Java?!?!

Ok...tell me again...what color do you see now?

Probably, they will be forced to offer pro-bono services like every other vendor who took on work for the Trump and wasn't paid.

And morale. This furthers emotional distress already experienced by job seekers with little hope.

Adds a whole new meaning to âoethe goose that laid golden eggsâ, doesn't it?

Perhaps, it was a prophesy?

And, a fighter jet named after him

Clearly, they rewrote the firmware in our President Putin Puppet. Why else would you shut down such efforts against our historical enemy (despite being allied in WW2)?

When autocorrect does work right, its time to reset it. It learns from how you use your phone and type. If you accept a misspelling, it learns, and will continue to make that mistake for you.

Having things like Grammarly installed or using other AI only complicates things.

But, why are images so grainy?

âoeStifling innovationâ. âoeBullying at an industrial scale.â

This is exactly what the EU is doing telling a business how they must play with competitors.

Apple is not a utility.

There are other cell phone, computer, and VR headset makers out there. What specific âoetechnologyâ must Apple share?

Developers can get developer accounts and write apps for the various platforms. They can purchase hardware, like we do if they want to build hardware to extend or interoperate with it.

What Apple might have to do is offer the guidance and technical docs via some sort of developer program. And, I guess Apple would have to provide some sort of testing and certification program. Again, nothing new.

But, if Apple has to give detailed designs on the tech that would enable copying their tech...Iâ(TM)d say, F Off EU.

But, still short $80. Screwed again.

In the 90â(TM)s, we developed Windows software that encrypted and signed email, offered secure file transfer, secure FAX, and secure chat. It was simple to use and incorporated the latest RSA libraries (before the scandal). It blocked email that failed dkim. We had law firms expressing interest.

We were going to charge $99. And, we even ported it Mac so it was cross platform.

Then, Microsoft and Netscape offered encrypted email for free just as we were to about accept VC. And WinSCP allowed secure file transfer. The interest in our product went poof overnight.

How do you convince people they should spend $99 when they could use MSâ(TM) or Netscapeâ(TM)s bogus implementation for free? Keep in mind, they had no idea how much their privacy really mattered until they are scammed or installed malware. They still donâ(TM)t.

Microsoft did nothing to make their process easy to use. But, they were Microsoft, right?

We never launched.

Still kicking myselfâ¦but we ran out of money trying to overcome ignorance.

Anyway, the Brits are used to their privacy being invaded by their govâ(TM)t. Nothing new there. Whether that laziness persists across nations? Who knows?

Just glad Apple took the path they did. Short of turning iCloud entirely and get everyone screaming and, likely, more pointless lawsuits and judgments, they just said F it.

Or, that you aren't running the drivers Datsung offers, perhaps?

Could it be the drivers your OS provides?

Oh, I won't disagree with you on the death of Borland. That whole Borland/Inprise/Borland/CodeGear/Embarcadero debacle was brutal - people thought the language and tool died.

Then people bailed to C# or Java or JavaScript (web dev) and others with no clue badmouthed the language (usually, C# devs)