Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Leap Towards a Career in Ethical Hacking with 60+ Hours of Prep Toward CISM, CISA, & More Certification Exams at 95% off ×

Comment Dawn of the Machine or Samaritan? (Score 1) 117

It's just a matter of time before they will hook these feeds into an AI (ala "Person of Interest") to process those feeds. Does putting something on the internet without a password make it a public asset? Makes you wonder how long it will take before they will be able to readily access even password protected cameras without a warrant."

Everyday, I walk through the Skyways of Saint Paul. There are cameras every hundred yards or so and at every turn and it's a bit disturbing. Still, the little cretins have managed to put up graffiti in a passageway two days in a row...something new.

Comment Re:QR Codes w/wo Shamir Secret Sharing (Score 1) 167

That's the premise of a Threshold-Based Secret Sharing solution. There are multiple ways to provide a scheme where you need some X of Y shares to recover a value based on WHO is trying to recover the secret.

The simplest is to implement a scheme where N shares are generated and M (where M is less than/equal) to N shares are required to recover a secret.

The same secret can be split into different numbers of shares (or, even splitting a particular share into more shares that get distributed).

Assuming that all the share holders don't meet on Facebook and collude to unlock your secret, you can comfortable distribute the shares and they need not be encrypted (they are useless without the quorum of shares).

Of course, all it takes is one or more share recipients to encrypt the share (or have it encrypted prior to sending it to them using asymmetric encryption) and then it will require those individuals to decrypt the share before your secret can be revealed. It may be, theoretically, harder to compromise an individual AND their share repository vs just the repository.

Comment QR Codes w/wo Shamir Secret Sharing (Score 4, Interesting) 167

Why not print the encrypted key as a QR Code?

Similarly, you could use Shamir Secret Sharing with a theshold to break the key up into N shares which could be provided to people you trust. Then, your (or those you designate - include law enforcement) could recover the keys provided they have the threshold number of shares.

Maybe when burning such info into a crystal becomes cheaper and feasible for the common person, it could be burned into one for all posterity.

Comment Re:Remember how "Top Secret" works (Score 1) 592

And, interestingly, "public" information can deemed classified if an analysis of the information and any related resources deem it so. And, such classification can occur at anytime. Does that mean everyone in possession of that information prior to classification should be held accountable for possessing it? No.

However, as you noted, removal of classification markings from a document does not make it any less so until the appropriate classification authority lowers or removes the classification.

Comment Not so new (Score 1) 215

This was state of the art in 2010 on T-Mobile.

Our pet tracker was re-purposed for personnel (not intentionally) and vehicle tracking. It also found its way to used car dealerships and, in particular, was designed for repossession when leasing to those with dubious credit histories (a fairly large market, btw).

The tracking data was uploaded and stored on our servers whenever the device had a strong cell signal.

Due to the size of the device, the technology was creepy and our ops folks had to share location logs when police were investigating murder and domestic assaults.

The high point was reviewing the more popular names people gave to their devices and posting the top 10.

Comment Just Apple? (Score 1) 875

How about make all companies doing business in the US use US resources (including human) rather than just focusing on one company outsourcing their labor?

Unless Apple is a national company (which, it isn't) or vital to national defense/security, I don't see how they legislate just one company to use his proposed model.

Comment Not Strictly Mobile Anymore? (Score 1) 17

When Facebook Messenger was announced, it was clear that only mobile devices could use the service. Additionally, the criteria for creating Messenger content was also fairly high. As a result, I wonder what the adoption rate of Messenger has been since its launch.

By opening up to BOT creation, there is now the potential to create potentially useful services for Facebook mobile users. This could be a good thing. I can think of several services and business models that could benefit from Messenger platform opening up to BOTS.

Comment Relative Unpredictability? (Score 1) 748

"...their relative unpredictability on the road are nonetheless leading to more accidents than expected."

Quite the opposite - they are predictable in that they follow all traffic laws - that's very predicatable. It's the unpredictability of human nature that causes the accidents. Should these robots be taught to break the law in order to conform with the behavior of their more chaotic human counterparts???

The article brought up another ethical question - the just one posed in Issac Asimov's book, "iRobot" - where the robots calculated the probability of survival and made the cold, calculating decision on who to save. In the case of a self-driving car and self-driving bus full of children, should the both vehicles decide to save the children or, simply, their occupants. Clearly, the latter would result in serious consequences if they both take the latter approach.

Submission + - Precursor to killing encryption (cnn.com)

Ronin Developer writes: The attached article is probably a clear indication that the fight against end-to-end encryption, privacy, and mandatory back-doors is about to ramp up. The article describes the "probable" use of encrypted apps by the Paris terrorists. It's just another log on the "anti-encryption" fire.

Comment As a former naval officer... (Score 3, Interesting) 350

Celestial navigation was taught in our Naval Science Navigation course. As naval bridge officers, we were required to learn celestial navigation primarily as tradition and to have a working understanding of the mechanics of the process. That being said, one must know where the ship is at all times. Today, we rely on GPS, inertial navigation systems and the gyroscopic compass (as opposed to a magnetic compass). There have been times when we lost GPS or LORAN C while at sea. We did experience loss of the gyroscopic compass in the middle of ocean and our ship didn't have INS. You have a mission to carry out and that entails safely navigating your vessel.

Basic skills such as dead reckoning and visual position fixes are used when near land. At sea, with no landmarks, knowing where you is just as important. Case in point is that there is an underwater mountain in the Pacific that ships still manage to hit. Avoiding those things is pretty important. Murphy's law will ensure that your ship fill find the underwater mountain or shoal waters if you aren't prepared.

Do navigators take celestial fixes every night the skies are clear? No. They do it from time to time to keep the traditions alive. And, should the skills ever be needed, they will have them. The calculations are tedius and no where as accurate as GPS fix. But, it's an interesting exercise and a time honored tradition.

Comment It wasn't working (Score 2) 78

I use Yahoo! as a throw-away, personal email. Went to use their new notification basis. I never received the token as they claimed I would. Did switch to their SMS version for on-demand passwords. That, actually, did work. Perhaps, the other system is working now and was just experiencing high demand/load issues due to all their users giving it a shot. But, after getting locked out three times trying to use this "feature", I don't think I will try it again anytime soon.

Comment Re:Price curve!! (Score 1) 117

I alluded to this in my last statement. Determining the proper selling price for a market is very much a science as well as trial and error. Sales teams go to great lengths to determine the proper selling prices.

The bottom line is that at the current exchange rates, a developer selling in the lesser performing markets is taking the equivalent of twice the Apple Tax. As I noted, the developer sells their ware at $0.99 in the US. They see only 70% of that income. Given that the AUD's exchange rate is .7, the developer's going to see only $0.49 vs $0.70 per the US market.

The math is pretty straight forward as to what the break even points would need to be at a given effective selling price and number of units sold.

0.49 N1 >= 0.70 N2

You have to sell 1.42 times as many units at the lower price point as the higher price point to break even. When that ratio is exceeded, the lower price point makes sense.

Now, one can argue that the product is being sold in multiple markets and the developer can afford to take less profit since they are still taking a profit. We are only assuming they are turning a profit given the cost to build and market their ware. Who are we to decide what is a fair profit for the seller to take? The decision to sell at the lower effective sales price is the seller's decision to make. And, they will make that decision after analyzing their markets and what the markets determine is a fair price for their product and maximize their profits in a capitalistic fashion (assuming they are capitalists). Or, they can be altruistic, sell at a lower price point, and whatever profit they earn is sufficient.

Comment Core Math at it again... (Score 5, Informative) 117

The title of the parent post is totally misleading and shows a clear sign of not having passed basic algebra. Australians are going to pay 15% more for their apps and not 50%.

First $1 AU = 0.70 US. Taking currency conversion into consideration, this means that a 0.99 App in the US store would cost $1.29 AU.
Next, we see that that $1.29 apps are being raised to $1.49. That's a $0.20 AU or a 15% price hike.

Converting that back to US, we see that the equivalent cost is $1.09 US vs the original $0.99 US. This $0.10 US difference equates to an actual 10% markup between the AU and the US markets.

I would have to assume that Apple is passing on their operational overhead costs in the pricing of apps.

Something to think about - developers are permitted to set the price of their apps. In the US, other than free, the minimum cost is $0.99 as that is the lowest tier that Apple permits. Should developers be forced to take a pay cut because they are selling in a market with a poor currency exchange rate or should they be permitted to sell their wares at a specific price they deem appropriate?

Given that Apple is going to reintroduce a $0.99 tier in those markets, should developers be expected to sell their apps at a 30% discount in the US as well? After the Apple tax of 30% on goods sold in the store, the developer makes a $0.50 on an item they originally sold for $0.99. Is that fair?

If developers are willing to take such a hit on their profits at the benefit of maybe selling more at the lower price and gaining a PR boost, then we will see them moving to the $0.99 plan in those poorer performing markets.

Comment Re:Evolution is key (Score 1) 131

Yes, readability is very important. Sadly, the trend I now see is that those migrating towards a senior role (or, what they believe an EA is) are unable to progress past the first couple of chapters. Had they, actually, had the proper training and mindset, they would be able to understand what the true value an EA brings to a business by having designed a system that is flexible and won't break as the business grows. Instead, we see senior individuals relegated to pasture and younger, less mature and experienced developers calling for a complete redesign (at significant cost) because they simply don't know what they don't know. It's the role of the EA to make sure the purpose and vision of the architecture and product roadmaps are understood by the team. And, they should help identify the weaknesses of their team and get them the training they need (training? Who pays for training???).

On the flip side, I have seen EAs who sit in their office and abstract away and never interact. Keeping your wonderful ideas and visions bottled up simply doesn't cut it. The less senior folks are put off by what they see and, frankly, rightfully so.

I am one of the EAs who has recently been put to pasture. Our organization decided to restructure and move away from developing products and services. Instead, they have decided to concentrate on just one small aspect of the business - the one that corporate felt makes them the most money prior to going public. Developers are left doing the same thing over and over again with no opportunity to step outside the box and expand their knowledge. There is no mentoring. I found myself hindered in my role in how I could interact with and mentor the developers - it was all about billable time vs growth. Now, I am gone - laid off - six months now. The developers have, thankfully, recognized boredom and all except the H1.B's and greencards have left. It's a very shortsighted and, I suspect, they will feel the ramifications in the future. Nah..they won't...they will just hire more H1.B's and greencards to fill the void because they won't rehire those now unemployed because of their shortsighted vision...we're damaged goods.

But, I can't find a job. I am finding that I am either overqualified or not specialized enough in the language/framework of the week or the role of architect is now being filled by organizations paying $80K instead of the $120K+ we used to command for the same "title". Like everyone else, I've got bills to pay. Yet, many hiring managers seem hard pressed to understand that I am comfortable going backwards and doing more coding for less pay. You might say you will never get in this position - I know that's what I did. Surprise.

Slashdot Top Deals

"You can't make a program without broken egos."

Working...