Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:$700 card to run console ports? (Score 1) 51

The PC exclusive Ashes of the Singularity is a standard in graphics benchmarks, including the one from the article. Even clearly console-oriented games like Dark Souls 3 are significantly better in graphical quality, framerate and load times with expensive hardware like this.

Comment Re:I'm a lawyer (Score 1) 369

Agreed - the client contact is the key bit. My job (business analyst) is in the same boat: most of the grunt work can easily be automated, but the real reason they pay me is to listen to people's stories and figure out what they really want, even though they lack the training to articulate it. Even in 20 years, a computer will have a hard time ignoring the reason you *said* you came to the office, and acting based on the real reason you're here.

Comment I gave Paper a spin over the weekend (Score 1) 26

I actually was pretty impressed. It's definitely more than just a note-taking app, it's focused more on collaboration. It does have a document surface to record the collaboration (you make lists of things, images, text, and so on), but the final result isn't supposed to be the pretty-print product, it's supposed to be everyone's collective ideas, comments, links, contributions, etc.

It did warm my heart to see markdown as an export format, and actually that kind of makes a lot of sense given the intent (just get 'er done, forget the fancy formatting.)

I could see myself using it, sure.

Comment Re:Not available for streaming at the moment (Score 3, Insightful) 38

It is interesting that you are able to describe an entire movie, yet still miss it what it was about.

I say this not as a criticism, because you sound like a smart person, you were obviously paying close attention, and you write about it very well. It is just very interesting because you clearly had some expectations about what the movie would be about, and those expectations were completely unfilled.

What you may not have been expecting is to see a movie that is entirely about EMOTION. Not plot. Not dialog. Not even characters, really. The plot, such as it is, is about intertwining emotional journeys, not physical ones. Each of the time jumps follows a clear arc in that journey, almost literally step by step. You have to jump through time -- you have to! -- to understand how each character wound up where they are today, and where they are going. That's because emotional development lags outward events, sometimes by years and years. And sometimes, outward events continue on, but emotional development stops in its tracks.

This is probably not a young person's movie, and again I say that with no disrespect intended. But I think you have to have some life experience with how discontinuous emotional development and outward events truly are, if you are going to appreciate this movie.

Let me just one other thing that might help. The intentional use of the long shots, the shots from a distance, vs. the shots close up are used to reflect the inner, emotional state you are supposed to be feeling. If the director wants you to feel detached, the camera sits back to audience-at-a-play distance, and events play out flatly. If he wants you to feel like you're gaining some insight, he uses a long lens with a close up, as if you're listening inside someone's head. It's really quite brilliantly done. And notice that the only time you really feel the full, borderless, bright light is when they are in the boat. The camera then pulls way out so you can take it all in. You're supposed to feel unbounded and free, which explains why the boat is so important in the emotional story. On land, everything is sad and laden. But we can't be sad all the time, there must be some release. The sea is that.

Comment Re:All data is subject to interpretation (Score 1) 460

This is a very insightful point, I would mod this up if I could. The answer to ANY question depends entirely on how you frame it. In fact, he who controls the framing controls the range of possible answers, so one of the biggest goals of any (dis)information campaign is to seize the framing first, then you can let people ask "any" question they like.

Comment Obamacare killed US IT (Score 0) 483

"The red ink was partially the result of an increased caseload from Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, which was expanded under the Affordable Care Act. Medi-Cal reimbursements are so low that UCSF loses 40 cents on every dollar it spends on those patients’ treatment, he says."

Comment Re:Metric / Imperial (Score 0) 167

Multiples of 3 are just so much more useful in everyday life than multiples of 10. I used the base 12 pica/point system in printing for many years, and always admired how trivially easy it was to calculate layout proportions. The human attention is drawn strongly to things in threes: three panels, three points in an argument, three parts to a story, and many others.

Comment Re:Credible study? (Score 1) 279

Is it just me, or is every evolution-based hypothesis -- and I do mean every single one I've ever read -- just a conclusion shopping for facts that may or may not support it, but cannot ever be proved experimentally? Shouldn't scientific hypothesis at least be testable? Let's leave metaphysics, philosophy, theology and all the other theoretical disciplines out of scientific inquiry. There's no experiment you could ever devise that would prove or disprove the hypothesis that monogamy caused the male penis bone to disappear, it's ludicrous on its face. Science is just ONE system of thought, not "the" system of thought. Not every darn square peg has to go through the round hole. No pun intended.

Comment Re:Credible study? (Score 2) 279

Is it just me, or does every evolution-based hypothesis -- and I do mean, literally, every, single one I've ever read -- seem like nothing more than an effect in search of a satisfactorily matching cause? When did we start coming to scientific conclusions first, and then go shopping for facts that "prove" them? These aren't even testable, now that I think of it. How could you possibly verify the truth or falsity of something like "monogamy caused the penis bone to disappear"? Shouldn't a requirement of a scientific hypothesis be that it can be experimentally demonstrated? Let's leave metaphysics and theology to the theoretical disciplines.

Comment Re:The Honeymoon is over I guess? (Score 4, Informative) 399

The exact same thing happened to me when I worked for one of the Big Six accounting firms. We HATED it, and as it turned out, it was a harbinger of things to come. Prior to that date, we had nice corporate social events held in nice places where we all dressed up. Afterwards, it was beer and pretzels, or no social event at all. It means that the bean counters are in control, and it's no longer going to be a fun place to work.

Slashdot Top Deals

We can defeat gravity. The problem is the paperwork involved.

Working...