Because protection mechanisms for HTTPS are on the lookout for code broken into chunks and sent in hexidecimal while the DNS protections are not. Sure. Pull the other one.

The law is unconstitutional, as other similar laws have been found in the past. It hasn't been removed from the books only because nobody has been charged for it in a century, thus nobody has had a chance to challenge it on those grounds. The exception is for the military, which has the UMC which is allowed to have stricter restrictions on behavior.

YEah, none of this will happen. Let's assume they don't have a prenup (in which case the settlement of assets is dictated by that). The wife would get 50% of what was generated during their marriage at best. That may include the house, but its value would be subtracted from what she got in cash. Alimony... depends on a lot of circumstances, but it's more rare and generally a limited time. Plus we have no idea what the wife's income is, she may make as much or more.

Will he get a job again? Of course he will. Probably not as a CEO in the near term, but he'll absolutely get jobs where he isn't a visible presence for the company. And in a few years the CEO jobs will open again, because nobody is going to give a fuck a year from now.

As for going to jail- no. If the alimony (which is unlikely to exist) does exist and it is set high, he goes back to court to get it lowered. Because alimony is based on your income (with a few exceptions for example purposefully staying unemployed). Given that he was just publicly fired, his current income potential is very low, so any alimony would be matchingly low. There are formulas for these things.

So in other words, your just spouting misogynistic bullshit.

No, it's not. Thinking requires understanding. Machines are incapable of doing that. They can recombine new facts, but they cannot and will never be able to think.

All of this presumes that Quantum Computers will work as predicted. That's like assuming that real computers work just like Turing Machines. They do not. Not only do real computers work differently, no real computer can fully implement a Turing Machine because Turing Machines have infinite memory. While most algorithms proven on a Turning Machine can in fact be usefully implemented on a real computer, it's not universal.

If real Quantum Computers don't match theoretical Quantum Computers, and I think it unlikely that they will, then it's not yet clear which algorithms will work on them and which require assumptions that won't end up being true.

The cognitive ability of AIs is 0. AIs do not think. They do not reason. They do not understand. They can probablistically predict output based on training data, and an input, and that's it. With programming, it can find bits of code on the internet that are related to the keywords you give it, but it can't actually code a damn thing on its own. Which makes it a slightly less useful version of stack overflow, and for it ever to become better it will need a quantum leap of new techniques that are not currently on the horizon.

Not all the world is the US. In the US, you're relatively safe... well at least as long as you were born a US national, it seems we're deporting those who aren't. And we'll see where that trendline goes.

Other nations outside the US and EU? Safety varies a lot. There are plenty of governments happy to punish or disappear protest starters.

Respectfully, I don't think you understand the concept of "no reason." Just because there are other ways to do a thing doesn't mean there's "no reason" to do it a particular way.

Some things need to work when most everything on the network is broken. Think: out of band access to the DNS server (DRAC, ILO, IPMI).

No, you know that some machine out there responded to that IP address. You don't know whether it's the one you meant or, say, the hotel's captive portal.

About SpaceX in particular? I'm not. About the sheer number of companies that behave similarly? Yeah, I'm bitter.

Actually, I declined the interview. This was in the pandemic before the vaccine. During the phone screen the recruiter told me all work was required to be on site and asked if I was okay with that. I said: sure, but only if I have an office so I can set up an air filter and generally control my working environment. The recruiter said no one gets an office, not even Musk. I said thank you and goodbye.

No partitions. No walls. No doors. Just desks and chairs.

The complaint wasn't about being in the same physical location. It was about the compulsory open-office configuration, even back in the middle of the pandemic.

Correct. Even in the middle of the pandemic he demanded on-site work and would not allow private offices in the building.

NASA hired women as scientists and engineers when that wasn't a thing. If her talents were worth it, that was that.

Musk won't hire people unwilling to work in an open office. And forget about telework. It doesn't matter what skills you bring to the table, Musk having his way is more important.

That's how NASA landed people on the moon while SpaceX's rocket keeps blowing up.