"If you do not read what I wrote but instead hallucinate something that sounds similar, you will obviously reach flawed conclusions."

gweihir has been spinning this sort of supercilious nonsense for more than 20 years whenever the issue of computer consciousness come up on /.

That's true: you can't rule out a computer program being conscious, and you never will. It's also true that you can't rule in a computer program being conscious, and you never will.

Computers are real physical objects, and so philosophical bullshit concepts like "consciousness" have nothing to do with each other.

And there is zero reason to assume that our "consciousness" is or isn't deterministic.

More women than men have been entering college/university AND graduating than men.

And overwhelmingly in arts, not STEM.

>Now this isn't automatically going to be "Kill all humans"
Until someone hacks it to do that.
And it will be hacked, like everything else.

Emphasis on "maybe".
In other words, no way to know how fast it may be until it exists.
Which it doesn't.

Known Physics would at least need a fundamental extension to explain it

Nonsense. We have no idea how AGI relates to "regular" physics.