Then they will do something else. Where does this line of reasoning end, just stopping innovation to preserve raw labor numbers?
Logically, with UBI. You can shut down all the social programs which it supersedes and their administration, take it back from people who don't need it through the IRS without any substantial changes, and pay for it through taxation on the wealthy — thereby creating more money by increasing its velocity.
Yes there were people who were left behind [most notably in agriculture] but on balance humans' quality of life is dramatically better.
Yes, and what I want the system to do instead of encouraging some wealthy people to play a game of increasing some numbers in ways which don't even affect their lives, and they are only doing for bragging rights, is share more of the available improvements in quality of life with more people.
I am far from against technology. I am against it destroying everything that we all universally enjoy, things like being able to eat and sleep and breathe and shit comfortably. Every world war is more dangerous to the continued existence of our way of life than the last, and we appear to be on the cusp of one. And for what? Once again, so that the worst old men the world could produce can play some games with others' lives. Does it not make sense that instead of allowing these rich old fucks to kill us, we should share the wealth more when that actually creates more wealth? How are we going in completely the wrong direction again?
My
And mine is for you.
Hey, maybe if it was the other way around and them darned Jews crossed into Gaza and fucked up a peace and love music festival
A peace and love music festival held right next to the apartheid wall, which was most importantly not held on the day on which history began.
Your arguments are stupid, and more importantly boring. You are a net loss for Slashdot.
I presume he's working with Republican Jesus. Maybe they are the same guy, you ever see them both in the same room?
It's not only an official act, it's official business.
Better than the autopenis? Yes. That's not even a question. If he can't find a teenager he'll fuck a flag.
That was not the claim.
Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy.
The Constitution is what gives Congress the power to make laws which implement those other parts of the government, so in no way is that moving past the Constitution.
And once again, we had a law preventing this until Bill Clinton signed the TCA.
What's your DNA doing this evening?
"who are REGULARLY found to be committing TREASON"
No, Republicans are home grown
We pay for Jews to commit genocide in another country so we don't have to look at it. It's very efficient.
You also know American Jesus loves you when you get lots of money.
Well he should have done a better job, the hairless apes are fucking it all up.
"The company demonstrated the technology on servers running Microsoft Teams services"
Teams services uses measurable CPU? It should be I/O bound. What an amazing anti-commercial for their software.
There's absolutely nothing to suggest anything illegal was going on.
HahahAHhaHaHAHAHA
If someone asks you for a cheek swab and you give it to them, no one has committed a crime.
Try looking up "coercion" sometime
"Oh what wouldn't I give to be spat at in the face..." -- a prisoner in "Life of Brian"