Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Summary is COMPLETELY WRONG (Score 1) 433

It is still completely possible for Google to use hashed passwords to authenticate users and only "save" the plain password in a "write only" file (text or separate database) with the unhashed passwords...

That's a distinction without a difference. It is absurd to keep a hash if you are required to keep the plain text. In reality this would mean encrypting the password, but it still comes down to eliminating hashing.

Comment Re:Why not just block attachments? (Score 1) 178

How does it decrypt the traffic? It can't; only the parties in the SSL handshaking can do that, and that is the user's browser and the end server with its certificate.

Other posts on this thread detail how this is possible: You work for company X and go to Company X creates a Certificate Authority SSL certificate and installs it on all browsers. When you go to the proxy intercepts and pretends to be by generating a new server certificate for and talking to your browser as if it were Since your browser trusts Company X's CA cert, it also trusts the fake cert created by the CA cert.

This is only possible if you are forced to use a browser with that CA cert installed, and the company has a proxy or other software/hardware that can essentially do a Man In The Middle attack.

Comment Actually, it *was* faulty design (Score 1) 1148

"The warnings were stark and issued repeatedly as far back as 1972: If the cooling systems ever failed at a Mark 1 nuclear reactor, the primary containment vessel surrounding the reactor would probably burst as the fuel rods inside overheated. Dangerous radiation would spew into the environment."

An unprecedented force of nature happened, and now over a hundred thousand lives are at risk.

Comment Of course not (Score 3, Insightful) 309

If you say it's ok for mobile carriers to restrict apps on cell phones, then you implicitly say it's ok for Comcast to dictate what you can have on your PC.

This is another reason why iOS and Apple's ridiculous idea that they can tell you what you can do with your property is a horrible precedent: it's my device, not yours.

Comment Re:and... (Score 1) 281

It's not as simple as them just trying to make more money. If they don't respond to the new and emerging threads from rivals, Google could eventually fail. This is part of the reason they extend into so many different areas such as Android. It's not just about making more profit; it's about ensuring long term survival.

Slashdot Top Deals

No skis take rocks like rental skis!