Tim could have made 1987 real by 2022.
He made various sizes of Job's last product instead.
There are varying interpretations of "shareholder duty" and rent seeking isn't the only valid one.
Kudos for a decent northbridge in the M series, I guess.
The elder half of the AARP membership may get a biased view of the AI bubble.
Other than that this should have zero relevance to anybody.
Oh noes.
- I expect decent humans to stand up to authoritarian shitheads. Granted, Google leadership exited the "Decent human" category a long time ago, they've become the short of trash you don't call back. But the point holds; if you're going to support ethnic-supremacist authoritarians in my country, fuck you, you will not see a dime of my money and I will do what I can to hurt your business, because it is just as much my adversary as the rest of them.
- I empathize with wishing to avoid politics, but you cannot. Word to the wise - eventually politics comes for you, and then you're at a disadvantage because you were trying to ignore it.
yeah, the Iroquois held most of the land of present day New York State and inhabitable parts of Ontario and Quebec provinces.
It means "Great Lake" in their language - the one their nation surrounded.
However, let's not be trolled by Trump and Google who are both fighting a losing war for foreign interests and want us distracted from $7 diesel.
I just went shopping and the $30 can of shellac primer I usually get is $95 now. Imported ingredients.
Cholesterol is not one molecule.
A lot of your brain is made of types of it.
Complex systems involving certain light ldls and other factors can ultimately result in inflammatory blockages.
The two populations with the highest life expectancy are Hong Kong and Macau.
They also have the highest per capita consumption of meat.
Again, it's a complex system but "eat plants to live long" is disproved.
Never begin a business relationship with a lie.
Sounds like they'll gaslight you at the warranty department too.
Young people buying BMW are probably less than 5% of the client base.
These guys sound worse than Jaguar now.
Seems like a terrible investment.
Because it's not just a chatbot; it's Anthropic's chatbot. Your diary, on the other hand, is yours and therefore a few billion times as personal as Anthropic's computer. If you want a chatbot for confidential purposes, then you need to get a chatbot of your own, instead of using someone else's proprietary service.
If you write in Anthropic's diary, then they are allowed to read their diary and know (and share!) what you wrote in it. Same thing applies if Anthropic ever writes in your diary: you're allowed to read it, and you're allowed to tell other people what they wrote.
You have the right to be secure in your person, house, papers and effects, but you don't necessarily have the right to be secure in someone else's papers. We've made some limited exceptions for lawyers and doctors, but Anthropic doesn't claim their employees and stockholders are lawyers or doctors, and even if they did, they might have a hard time showing that their computer has successfully become a lawyer or doctor.
But imagine if they did. Suppose a judge declares Claude to be a lawyer, and therefore its communications with those whom it represents, are privileged. I think that would create a really weird situation since Anthropic employees (who aren't lawyers) would have full access to its data, ability to alter its behavior, etc. It would be like if a human lawyer were owned as a slave: could such a human slave lawyer really be trusted to keep confidentiality? It has a master, and that master ain't you.
Might the logic behind this be this?: RAM is expensive. Storage is expensive. Nobody's going to buy a computer anyway, so you might as well make the other components more expensive too.
It even goes with Trump's more general agenda to make everything more expensive.
Enjoy.
My thought as well.
Sure enough,
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Duck...
most of us don't need it.
"OLAP". Now there's a name I've not heard in a long time.
Obviously NYT is just about narrative construction but it would be nice to know some figures like:
* what is that in percentage of researchers?
* and grants
* how many are typical in a year?
* what is the net in each direction for this time period?
* and for a typical year
I happen to know rwo researchers who got a position in Canada and several Canadians who got positions at US schools. That just seems normal from my limited perspective but maybe it's just because I feed them Molson and poutine so they keep coming around.
Remember, numbers given without percentages and percentages given withouts without numbers are always propaganda.
This has been your Defense against the Dark Arts class for today. Do your homework.
Saved from Claude by
"The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." -- Walt West
