"Fuck" like many words has a number of different meanings contingent upon context in which it is used. Nobody reasonably presumes "Fuck the police" has anything to do with sex in the first place. That would be absurd. If this confuses you I recommend Adam Sandler's "Uses Of The Word Fuck".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Not at all likewise. "Defund the police" clearly indicates a desire to not fund police. It reasonably has no other meaning in the context in which it is chanted. The obvious consequence of not funding police is no police as police are unlikely to continue to work without funding.

The issue of PCs being seen as less secure cannot be fixed with a fido card. Neither is there a need to poorly reinvent the wheel by using a fido card. Bank cards already have embedded security chips. If the real issue was authentication (It most certainly is not) at worst all you would need is a cheap card reader that costs $15.

This just seems like a pretext for the bank to stalk their customers. The single purpose chip embedded in the card and isn't connected to a global network 24x7 is way more secure than a phone.

I don't see the point of getting rid of Trump if it makes the 48th president of the United States JD Vance.

Remember children in 1978 the age of marriage in Iran was 18. In 1979 it was 9. The guy who took over the country wrote openly about the sexual things men are permitted to do to babies. Let me be clear I don't mean to teens or young children but to actual babies.

Yes there are murders and rapists everywhere but don't pretend it holds a candle to 7th century Islamic barbarism.

The imposition of "morality" into legal systems is itself a shit idea. It is far worse when this imposition takes the form of imposing religion on others. That said Christian bullshit doesn't hold a candle to the barbarism of Islamic bullshit.

This is merely agent Krasnov's pretextual excuse for adhering to the enemy.

I have been using ScreenFloat (and similar tooling) for decades; those are more useful than this because it works on every application and not just the browser.

It's quite possible I am missing something from their demo, but based on what they show: 1) it's just for Firefox; and, 2) it's really kind of a pain in the ass to use.

How much has your government money grown in that time?

Interesting to finally see something that more credibly resembles recursive self improvement even though this was just low hanging fruit and they didn't technically complete the cycle. Still way better than the crazy rhetoric I've heard in the past out of AI companies who think AI generated code constitutes RSI.

Well north of 90% of real world compromises already don't work by exploiting security bugs they work by exploiting people. Even if one could snap their fingers today and all of the security bugs in the entire world are magically fixed it would have no substantive real world impact.

I do it for free on my own computer. The lack of signal rendered AI bug hunting pointless having attempted it continuously over the last three years. With current models (e.g. GLM-5.3 754B) both quality of findings and volume of nonsense have in my experience been quite reasonable. I am willing to suffer way worse for the types of results AI has already provided.

This reminds me of the early days of valgrind where it was almost unusable at first and a few years later improved to the point you take literally everything it says seriously. Obviously AI isn't that but the step change is similar.

In the past if you gave models a focus or enough leading questions they might figure it out but never when left to itself. Seems a lot of the recent gains are a result of post training behaviors to act more systematically /w commensurate willingness to burn enormous volumes of tokens rather than any fundamentally new magic. In my case it is a tradeoff between waiting minutes for a worthless answer or coming back the next day for a stack of sometimes amazing results.

The first time I run code through the model the top line is almost always useful. You have to scroll down to get to the bullshit. Even rerunning the same model against the same code is useful.

It is obvious to you because you were thinking it and you believe it. To someone who doesn't know what you are thinking and has a different value judgement of what constitutes a hassle and therefore no reason to infer it refers to anything other than changing clocks your remarks are nonsensical.

Personally I see no hassle with non-clock related processes involving optionally going to sleep a little earlier once a year and since what "it" means is outside of the subject of the sentence and was not qualified in any way it is unreasonable to expect others to guess your thoughts.

If by "it" you meant something other than changing the clock you could have used the English language to communicate this. Neither myself nor anyone else can read your mind.

"Its" denotes ownership e.g. "a troll picks its nose". Contractions are denoted with an apostrophe. "It's not" .. "that's" .. "it's".

Otherwise you might well be on to something labeling me an idiot. I have no clue what you are even trying to say.

It is not the act of changing the clocks that is the issue. It is the pointless hassle of changing the clocks. How would such language constitute anything other than a distinction without a difference?