Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Insane (Score 2) 33

My first thought. They must have close to 100 million customers. So this works out to about ten cents per customer. Wow, that's some punitive fine! Just another example of how "capture theory" is the norm in the US these days. The FDA is captured by Big Pharma. The SEC is captured by Wall Street. And the FCC is captured by the Big Carriers.

Comment Re: Truckle up economics (Score 2) 277

"Otherwise, you're not rich enough to justify maintaining a holiday home as well as your own home, inherited or not." To whom do I need to 'justify' my possessions? You? Some tribunal somewhere?

Our family cottage has been in the family for 99 years now. In recent years, the property has increased in potential value because it has 220' of lake front. Developers want to buy the barely-used farm behind us (and the farmer is eager to sell), buy the cottage, and use it as a beach for the multiple homes they want to build.

My brother (titular owner) and I are both eager to maintain the cottage so that our children and ideally, our grandchildren can enjoy the same experiences we did, and our father did, when we were kids. But if he were to die in a car crash, we'd have to sell because I don't have 1/4 of a million sitting around to pay the estate taxes.

I'm so glad you believe a bunch of bureaucrats desire for moar cash so they can spend on things THEY think are important is more important than building and maintaining family traditions amongst people who are not so rich that can't "justify" owning a dinky 3-bedroom cottage along with their city home.

Comment Re: Truckle up economics (Score 1) 277

Just to add on: property taxes In Toronto, there were stories about people who owned homes and businesses for 40 years, but had to sell out because the land values had increased so much, the property taxes were now far beyond their ability to pay. This happens because property taxes, like inheritance taxes, don't take into account the cash flow of the person who's supposed to pay them.

Comment Re: Truckle up economics (Score 1) 277

I'm trying to understand your argument. If small business owners (SBO) "no longer have to take so much out of the business for themselves" - do you mean "their profits"? - "maybe they'll higher (sic) someone to help." So, if I'm an SBO, and I'm suddenly gifted with an extra $1,000 per month, I'm going to hire a new person? Here in Ontario - where the pilot program was tried - minimum wage is $14 per hour. So, $1,000 buys less than 20 hours of labour per week. And it's even less when you factor in that the employer has to pay employee health tax, employer's share of CCP and UI payments, etc. So at most, you could hire someone for about 15 hours a week. Assuming you could find someone who only wants to work 15 hours, what does that give you? Name the small business - a coffee shop? A dry cleaner? a gas station? - and tell me what who is going to hire an extra person with a $1,000 per month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Is your job running? You'd better go catch it!

Working...