That's because, for now, they have what people want. But as the streaming services see them as a threat they will remove their content from google and remove stations as well. I used google TV because it was the only way for me to easily watch the NFL, and it had everything else as a package. That's exactly why I only use shitty services like netflix, paramount, apple TV et. al. for a month at a time. They've stratified themselves so heavily that each only has a show or two that I want to watch.

Actually, it's not that hard for ANYONE to do that....

How many arrests were made?

https://xkcd.com/932/

This is happening exactly because the auto companies see the value of information and they want to monetize it rather than Hanson it to Google and Apple for free. The rest is lies and bullshit. I work for the auto companies.

"Free Enterprise" companies are gonna free enterprise. Slap a fee on them and they'll just add it somewhere else. Have to make those shareholders happy.

Don't even ask me how many times I had to read this sentence in the article to have it make sense.

"A more compact version of the model will from today power suggested messaging replies from the keyboard of Pixel 8 smartphones."

My 8th grade english teacher would have circled that in red and written "ACKWARD" in huge letters.

No. No it's not. To allow ANY secure work on a phone, corporations need controls to prevent exactly this from happening.

Example: I'm attending a private webinar for my company and financial outlooks are being discussed weeks in advance of a quarterly profits announcement. I take a quick screen shot and send it to my friends.

This is a situation where certain users need the ability. The problem here is that the APP shouldn't have that permission without being granted it specifically.

You are trying to rewrite past and current events. Stop it.

Do you know the definition of the word fascist? It's pretty much the antithesis of people on the left side of the political spectrum.

Stop trying to redefine words you don't understand.

Want to know how to spot someone who's never tried acting?

It's bad. From the super-annoying and can't-act teenage miss marvel, to the super my and can't act Brie Larson, to the musical number to the bad plot to the lame villain, this movie sucked to to bottom. Spider man has been the only thing worth watching in marvel since end game.

Funny I was thinking the same thing. Create a vetting process and let certain people rank the Google results for that extra level of filtering. Maybe we can start disposing of the thousands of Indian written duplicate websites that all start with "clear your cache".

FUCK Buckeye Arizona. Take a look at Google maps at how they are using their water now. Green lawns and farming in the fucking desert.

Whoa. What an incredibly hot take.

The entire movement for equality started way way... well.... probably as long as men and women existed. Women deserve an equal part of the responsibility to the movement. After all - look at the dissolution of men's only boys clubs, the Boyscouts being the most famous.

It's time for both sides to understand that this artificial division creation can't be fair for one sex and one for the other. There is a whole different conversation on fairness versus equity, and I think that is where the sticking point on this comes. If women are under -represented and under paid and this is an attempt to address it, then it's obvious the men don't belong there. But the United States laws don't have the granularity to restrict attendence.

Shitty moderators ban a guy for reporting a crime. Shitty moderators try to hide behind 'it rubbed me the wrong way when he talked (bragged) about it." Shitty moderators will be shitty moderators.