Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Feed Is Hunting Via The Internet Okay When It's Art? (techdirt.com)

Despite the lack of a real problem, the push for laws banning internet hunting -- where people shoot animals using a gun connected to a webcam -- remains strong. One such bill has been introduced in Illinois, where it's passed the house unanimously and is awaiting passage in the state senate. Coincidentally, an Iraqi artist has launched a new interactive installation in a Chicago gallery, in which he's locked himself in a studio for six weeks and letting people take shots at him (via Boing Boing) with a paintball gun connected to a webcam. It's intended to be a provocative, political piece, but there's another question: would it run afoul of the state's proposed anti-internet hunting law? The bill states: "A person shall not operate, provide, sell, use, or offer to operate, provide, sell, or use any computer software or service that allows a person not physically present at the hunt site to remotely control a weapon that could be used to take wildlife by remote operation, including, but not limited to, weapons or devices set up to fire through the use of the Internet or through a remote control device." Does a paintball gun constitute "a weapon that could be used to take wildlife", and is the artist setting up a whole bunch of viewers for misdemeanor crimes by inviting them to take shots at him? That seems unlikely, but the coincidental timing of the installation raises one interesting potential unintended consequence of internet hunting bans.
User Journal

Journal SPAM: Truth 2

A friend of mine is an interpreter, at the same time a respectful Christian. He said 'Truth is simple, if it's not, not everyone can understand.' I interpret what he wanted to say 'Truth is simple, because truth must be the one that everyone can understand.' Probably he was referring to the phrase like God is Almighty, intending to invite me.

Google

Submission + - Google to be our Web anti virus protector ?

cyberianpan writes: For some time we've noticed warning on Google searches that "this site may harm your computer" when Google has tagged the site as containing malware. Now Google is further publicising the level of infection in a paper titled: The Ghost In The Browser. Google are now promising to "identify all web pages on the internet that could be malicious"- Google with its powerful crawling abilities & data centres is best positioned to do this. This is potentially a very useful service but not all URLs we visit are from Google searches, some we still type in, others as links from pages. However could we soon expect a Firefox add in that will filter all http requests through Google ? So then our new overlords will indeed know everything about our web-habits ?

Feed Just For The Record, Google Not Buying Dow Jones (techdirt.com)

As if there were any doubt, Google CEO Eric Schmidt has confirmed that his company has no interest in buying a media company, like Dow Jones. This, of course, should be really obvious to anyone that understands Google's business, yet the company managed to turn up in a list of possible suitors for Dow Jones following News Corp.'s bid for the company. At the time, it was obvious that it wasn't an idea to be taken seriously, but rather an indication of Google's prominence that it always comes up in such discussions. Instead of buying content creators, Schmidt said that Google is more interested in partnering with them, which is something that Richard Parsons at Time Warner might want to think about before making any more wild west analogies. However, while Google won't be buying any media companies, it's safe to assume that the DoubleClick purchase won't be its last, as it continues to aggressively expand its product offerings.
Sci-Fi

Submission + - Mission Could Seek Out Spock's Home Planet

An anonymous reader writes: Science fiction may soon become science fact. ScienceDaily reports that astronomers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory have recently concluded that the upcoming planet-finding mission, SIM PlanetQuest, would be able to detect an Earth-like planet around the star 40 Eridani, a planet familiar to Star Trek fans as Vulcan. 40 Eridani, a triple-star system 16 light-years from Earth, includes a red-orange K dwarf star slightly smaller and cooler than our sun.
Google

Judges Rule Google Search by Employer Not Illegal 185

An anonymous reader passed us a link to an Ars Technica article about a failed lawsuit over a Google search. A federal circuit court of appeals has upheld the original ruling against David Mullins, who claimed that Googling his name constituted ex parte communications prior to firing him. "Through a series of events, Mullins' employer found that he had misused his government vehicle and government funds for his own purposes — such as sleeping in his car and falsifying hotel documents to receive reimbursements, withdrawing unauthorized amounts of cash from the company card, and traveling to destinations sometimes hundreds of miles away from where he was supposed to be ... Mullins' supervisor provided a 23-page document listing 102 separate instances of misconduct. Mullins took issue with a Google search that Capell performed just before authorizing his firing. During this Google search, Capell found that Mullins had been fired from his previous job at the Smithsonian Institution and had been removed from Federal Service by the Air Force."
Portables (Apple)

Submission + - iPod/iPhone Nano with touch panel at the bottom

Staska writes: "New Apple patent filing shows new directions for Apple's touch interface design. For smaller devices like iPod Nano, touchscreen interface may not be feasible — the screen is just too small for touch operation. According to the patent, Apple can still make full screen iPods and put a touch panel on the backside of the device with transparent controls on the front screen. In addition to iPod, patent filing also describes controls for the phone. ZDNet even thinks that this patent can hint about touch interface for all Apple products."

Comment A seller's interesting strategy. (Score 3, Interesting) 82

I won a Wii on eBay for $40. Yes, forty dollars. And the seller actually made double what he bought the Wii for. Here's what he did:

Instead of selling the Wii for $450-$500 and (Zelda:TP thrown in), the seller was instead selling cards from a 52 card deck. Each card cost $20.00. When you bought a card, the seller would write your ebay name on the card and put it in a sack.

At the end of the auction, if at least 26 cards had been sold, he'd pick a card out of the sack and they would then be shipped the Wii. If he hadn't sold 26, he would have refunded all the money.

So I bought two cards because I had some spare cash, won, and I recieved my Wii in 3 days. All but one person left positive feedback for the seller's unique selling strategy.

Instead of selling a Wii and game for 450-500 (retail 250 + 50 = 300 ), he ended up selling 30 cards for $20 each. He got $600 and I only spent $40. Win-Win situation, if you ask me (except for those who lost $20 with nothing, but hey, that's gambling).

Slashdot Top Deals

I've finally learned what "upward compatible" means. It means we get to keep all our old mistakes. -- Dennie van Tassel

Working...