I donâ(TM)t think intelligent is the right word. There was such an intersection a street over from my house in Toronto and I would have to get off my bike, go and push the pedestrian crossing button and then get back on. Fucking annoying and whomever thought it was a good idea was clearly brain dead.

Merkel's relationship and strategy with Russia/Putin was complex. I believe her goal was to maintain stability and prevent escalation to avoid conflicts or more serious conflicts. Hindsight is 20-20 and sheâ(TM)s been criticised by many people for how she handled Russia.

Chrome is a better product than Firefox, but if I wasn't such a heavy Mac user, I would make the same choice as you. I can take a lot if it means no Google in my life.

I ditched Firefox and Chrome at least 13 years ago and have used Safari exclusively since. In fact, Chrome hasn't ever been installed on this MBP, which I've had for five years. I don't miss their bloating and battery drain, nor having a privacy raping app from Google. I also appreciate the integration with Messages and Mail for how easy this makes 2FA on web sites that send codes, as well as unified keychain and history across all of my devices. That doesn't mean I'm unaware of the current state of the other browsers: I do have FF, which I dabble with occasionally, but it drives me nuts, it's just shit and it's obvious why it's losing market share, and I get forced to use other browsers on remote Windows machines or in local VMs of Windows and Linux.

This is well put. I'd also add that people are relentlessly marketed to to consume more to support that economic growth. People from the 19th or early 20th century might well consider the amount of psychological pressure we get to buy things to be a relentless propaganda campaign.

I think there are some other points worth considering here. The "chasing arrows" logo was originally intended more for labeling material content than recyclability. And there is evidence that plastic/petchems industry has used this state of affairs to promote plastics as being much recyclable than they actually are.

Everything I've learned suggests that only plastics # 1-3 are "practicably recyclable" in that the material recovered from these has decent purity and can be used for a meaningful range of purposes. That's because plastics vary hugely in terms of their actual chemical composition and how they react to common recycling methods. In fact AFAICT really only cardboard and some metals recycle "usefully" at present. So if you are going put energy into recycling, aluminum cans and cardboard give the most ROI.

So there is merit to the argument that those arrows are, as they currently exist, misleading to consumers.

There's also merit to what you are saying in that tying the state of recycling facilities for a particular set of materials is inherently complicated.

IMHO the key question is how to get more materials to be actually and meaningfully recyclable, and how to set up waste collection so that more materials can be usefully recovered from existing waste streams.

I haven't read enough about this bill to figure out whether it's likely to help or hinder, but that's the benchmark that I'd apply.

There are considerably more than two sides to this issue...

The 2013 rMBP can run OS XI, aka macOS 11 Big Sur. There are either a lot of people who didnâ(TM)t update their OS or a large number of very old devices out there, or both. Well, Mac hardware of good and it lasts along time. Yes, I have a Core 2 Duo-based 2007 MBP I still use.

Spot on.

What happens when people take someone's "cute OOTD" pic and put them in another outfit without any consent? That kind of stuff will get the young people off of Insta and looking back at Snap or VSCO others.

What happens when someone swaps a paid influencer's merch for another brand?

And that's not even touching the whole issue of non-consensual sexual content.

And why exactly do regular people who post like or want that content to be manipulated? What's the value to the primary content-making user?

The Zuckodei and Pinchmans of the world seem to think that people will make public content no matter what they do. I'm not naive enough to think they'll all migrate to Proton or privacy-preserving OSS stacks, but I do think even regular people have limited patience for having their thoughts, communications, and likenesses changed and monetized without benefit to them.

And you Terminal is listed under "Developer Tools" in Privacy & Security? FWIW, mine is also listed under "Full Disk Access".

I'm on an Intel MBP. lldb never requires a password. I only debug command line apps - maybe that's it?

Iâ(TM)m wondering whoâ(TM)s typing passwords these days for elevation. Havenâ(TM)t all Mac laptops had Touch ID for years? I have an external keyboard, but itâ(TM)s still easier and faster to reach over to my MBP for one touch authentication.

I donâ(TM)t get prompted like this. Is this is an extra step in Apple Silicon machines or Iâ(TM)ve just granted more permissions to my terminal?

Oh yes! I remember being at an air show on a small RAF base and a Vulcan did a low-level turning pass with the belly to towards the crowd. It was probably one of the loudest things I've ever heard. Military engines certainly have different priorities to civilian ones.

we no longer live in First World countries where you can rely on the power to stay on

Speak for your country, not the rest of the First World. I haven't experienced a power outage since I left N. America in 2008. Given the lag in grid investment here in the UK to reshape it with all the changes, that might change. But for now, it's been incredibly stable.

Maybe I wasn't clear: Concorde was loud, irrespective of whether the throttle was fully on and afterburners lit, or not.

I'm also glad we don't get any 747s anymore, which were quieter than Concorde. 777s are definitely the ones I've noticed to be loudest these days, especially when planes are coming over every three minutes from 04:30-05:00 in the morning. They're offensively loud compared to the 787s and A350s, and even A380s. But this is a different story.

I think you've downplayed the flight time on a conventional passenger jet for LHR-JFK by an hour at least and exaggerated the Concorde time by 30 mins.

Concorde's prices were determined by a number of factors such as fuel, but one of main ones was exclusivity/privilege.