I've been coming to
This is the first design change that has actually made me consider leaving.
0) to obtain nude or otherwise entertaining photos
Yup, I'm being extremely sarcastic here but if my memory serves me sufficiently well, there were cases proving that this indeed occurs from time to time.
"So we're bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I'm the idiot?" - Sarah Palin
wasn't there already a story about females in tech?
Yesterday's (Monday's?) story about whether Grace Hopper could get hired in today's SV.
That may end up being a bad habit for her: http://ehtrust.org/keep-that-cell-phone-out-of-your-bra/
Or it may mean nothing at all: http://www.cbcf.org/central/AboutBreastCancerMain/AboutBreastCancer/Pages/Facts-and-Myths.aspx
The issue here isn't that MAC addresses are unique, it's that users aren't bright enough or are too lazy to turn off wi-fi detection when they're not using it.
Exactly. As to the "large" address space - it's large if the random-number generator is actually random and has been seeded with a unique value. We've seen lots of bugs and exploits show up because those two conditions were not met.
How many hardware guys does it take to change a light bulb? "Well the diagnostics say it's fine buddy, so it's a software problem."