Comment Re:Much easier solution (Score 1) 124
I'm sure this will somehow become a tax write-off and he'll get a significant rebate on that tax return.
A false positive rate of 10% _among the population of people you arrest_ is acceptable.
I highly disagree. I can understand if Flock's data provided a 10% false positive rate, it's then up the police to do their actual job and gather other evidence to reduce that to near zero before taking any action on that data.
A 10% false arrest rate is criminal. Arrests stick with people even when their is no conviction. Maybe 1 false arrest in 1000 is acceptable in a civilized country without corruption.
I hate when someone gets away with a serious crime, but I'm not going to balance that by lowering the bar for arresting someone.
If it's worth hacking on well, it's worth hacking on for money.