I'm a Slackware diehard: it's been my primary distro since 1995. Will 12.0 have an official AMD64 port? It's high time there was one. I know there have been unofficial ones such as Bluewhite, Slamd64 and the other one, but I think lack of an official build is a major problem.
I had great plans to do my own one, but I haven't had the time. Last year I was messing about with Splack on an old Sun Ultra 1.
It has always puzzled me how there's an official Slackware S390 port but no AMD64...
AFAIK -- I am not a big AMD64 user -- Slamd64 has always been the best solution. But, hey, I may be wrong. Fred Emmott does a great job tracking the changes that are brought to Slackware (his website indicates slamd64 is now up to 12.0RC1, for instance). Also AFAIK, Patrick V. has stated repeatedly that "normal/vanilla" Slackware runs very well on AMD64, with few changes, and that the performance boost that would come from re-compiling everything for 64 bits CPU is not worth the time. Not to mention it would
Also AFAIK, Patrick V. has stated repeatedly that "normal/vanilla" Slackware runs very well on AMD64, with few changes, and that the performance boost that would come from re-compiling everything for 64 bits CPU is not worth the time.
Indeed it runs perfectly since AMD64 processors are perfectly backwards-compatible with x86-32 processors.
As for the "performance boost" his statement is a bit simplistic, but he's a busy man and needs to concentrate his efforts on pleasing as many customers as he can (every
We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
when it's necessary to compromise.
-- Larry Wall
hmm (Score:1)
AMD64 (Score:2)
I'm a Slackware diehard: it's been my primary distro since 1995. Will 12.0 have an official AMD64 port? It's high time there was one. I know there have been unofficial ones such as Bluewhite, Slamd64 and the other one, but I think lack of an official build is a major problem.
I had great plans to do my own one, but I haven't had the time. Last year I was messing about with Splack on an old Sun Ultra 1.
It has always puzzled me how there's an official Slackware S390 port but no AMD64...
Re: (Score:2)
Also AFAIK, Patrick V. has stated repeatedly that "normal/vanilla" Slackware runs very well on AMD64, with few changes, and that the performance boost that would come from re-compiling everything for 64 bits CPU is not worth the time. Not to mention it would
Re: (Score:2)
Also AFAIK, Patrick V. has stated repeatedly that "normal/vanilla" Slackware runs very well on AMD64, with few changes, and that the performance boost that would come from re-compiling everything for 64 bits CPU is not worth the time.
Indeed it runs perfectly since AMD64 processors are perfectly backwards-compatible with x86-32 processors.
As for the "performance boost" his statement is a bit simplistic, but he's a busy man and needs to concentrate his efforts on pleasing as many customers as he can (every