I realize all AI is not the same, and I realize my personal experience doesn't count for much. However, today I went to a dental appointment that I had made over the phone with an AI answering system. It's the first time I've made an appointment that way. When I arrived at the dental clinic, I discovered that there was no appointment scheduled for me. Since AI answers Comfort Dental's phone, I would have had no way to confirm the appointment, even if I had thought to do so.
It's noteworthy that the staff at the clinic defended their appointment-making method. They said there are pros and cons with AI, and my experience was just a little con.

I used to go into casinos to eat at the all-you-can-eat buffets. It seems nowadays, many casinos are getting rid of those. Besides, the older I get, the less I can eat.
I live in Kansas City, MO. I don't gamble in organized games. Life is a gamble enough.

Stores placing milk in the rear of the store is hardly comparable to entire businesses designed to trick dumb people into gambling at unfavorable odds.
The next time you go to a casino, as you walk the path inward, look at the faces of the people coming out. Some of them are crying, and if they are happy, they are also drunk.

How? How do these radio waves affect the zinc filler in the socket? What happens?

The money and stuff we gave to Ukraine is only partially wasted. Most of it isn't really spent; it's moved around. The US legislature approves the expenditure. The US government distributes the money while incurring a debt. The oligarchs in Europe take a slice. The legislators themselves get some too. Contractors make some money. various people who set things up get a commission. Some of the money actually goes to the over-priced weapon systems and shipping them.
When the government spends money it is not the same as when a private party spends. A PP tries to minimize the expense because its funds are limited. The government "wants" to maximize the expense because the more spent, the more there is to spread around.
In terms of the subject matter of this thread, if we want the government to spend our money on useful endeavors, rather than destroying things and people, we need to somehow replace Ukraine with scientific projects. Using the current system, allocating money this way would still be inefficient, but it wouldn't be as morally horrible.

All your news links are mainstream media. They speak as one when it comes to issues involving the US government. Try some stuff from countries that are in competitive or even in adversarial positions. https://www.rt.com/ may have its own bias, but at least we know what it is.

The video https://youtu.be/fBBknrisvHU claims the standard machine uses the same electricity as a washing machine, which is 500 watts. I'm suspicious of that, but even that isn't going to be easy for people of developing nations.

backup, Problem Solved

The group or person who did it is reading this thread, I'm sure. So, sending a message to them is easy.

Most of these "chargers" are just electrical outlets. The charging circuitry is in the vehicle. It is not difficult to install an outlet somewhere.

I am thankful to be among the last few generations of flesh humans. In the future, we will be a piece of code somewhere. This is the end. Thank you, Universe.

Correct. You can't "buy" a tweet. I suppose you could buy the copyright, but that doesn't make sense either. This is just a transfer of money for whatever reason we don't know.

As a heroin addict, I use syringes daily, and I've received the first Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine shot.
The most common syringe is a so-called "insulin" syringe. This is not considered a Low Dead Space (LDS) syringe. The 1-milliliter (or 1 cc) kind is the most popular. The amount of liquid wasted is tiny - less than a hundredth of a milliter.
I didn't notice how big the vaccination was, but I imagine it was around half a milliliter. I don't see how you could squeeze another full dose from the wasted liquid of 5 doses. At least I don't see how an LDS syringe could make much of a difference.

Why "clean up" leaves? Aren't they natural? What harm do they do?

Five % of pollution from mobile sources, including cars, comes from mowing lawns (EPA source). The amount of petroleum products spilled accidentally while mowing laws in the US per year more than equals the spill from the Exxon Valdez. Every ER in the country prepares for injuries from lawn mowing when the weather looks good on a weekend. Local animals lose their habitat. (I have more.)
Mowing lawns is often totally unnecessary. The city I'm in mows areas that can't be seen by the public unless they hike a distance. But the contractor gets paid for doing it, and it gets mowed every couple of weeks.
Sometimes neighbors get violent on a resident who neglects to mow. There is some kind of instinct that likes smooth, flat grass. I think it's from when humans split from the apes about 10,000,000 years ago. They took the trees, and we took the savana.
Anyway, you can see which side I'm on.