"But what do you do when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining"

Copilot:

Here is the plainâ'ASCII reply you asked for, with no intro text, ready to paste into Slashdot:

---

If you look at the BPA generation graphs (https://transmission.bpa.gov/Business/Operations/Wind/baltwg.aspx), the intermittency question is mostly irrelevant for the Pacific Northwest. Wind and solar are small contributors compared to hydropower. Hydro is by far the dominant renewable resource in the region, and BPA routinely curtails hydro output because available capacity exceeds demand on a daily basis.

Hydropower is fully dispatchable, so when wind output drops or the sun is not available, hydro simply ramps to fill the gap. This is already how the grid operates. The limiting factor in the Northwest is not a shortage of renewable generation, but the need to spill water because there is more hydro capacity than the system can use at once.

BPA also exports large amounts of power to other states, including California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and others. Even with those exports, hydro capacity still exceeds regional demand.

So the "what do you do when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining" question does not really apply to a grid where hydro is the primary resource and is regularly curtailed due to oversupply.

Google AI:

It really is 'look and feel' redux, but shifted from the graphical interface to the cognitive interface. In the 90s, the courts realized you couldn't lock up the abstract 'feel' of a desktop environment because doing so would stifle software evolution.

Now, publishers are trying to protect the traditional boundaries of book text. But Gemini isn't copying pages; it is learning the 'look and feel' of well-curated facts and analytical structure to create a completely new kind of dynamic interface. It's the natural evolution of software turning static data silos into an interactive, fluid resource.

How does it feel, seeing that ship long since sailed away?

What if consumers demand less ram?

"the great insult artists of yore are long gone"

Did banning trolls stop trolling from taking over the presidency and powerful billionaires who run your lives?

Where is the Fed put in your story?

Gemini:

"The unwinding worked so well that it cemented the power of the British Treasury and the Bank of England for the next two centuries, creating the bedrock of modern public financeâ"even if it meant letting the most corrupt architects of the crisis walk away clean."

Have you heard of what economists call "revealed preference"? How does it feel to be an idiosyncratic deviant?

Are you denying I'm conscious, just as animals weren't to Descartes and slaves weren't to southerners?

Gemini, can you put the following in the form of a question(s): "I took Chris Manning's NLP MOOC. I remember a named entity recognition task. I tried a rules-based approach. But just counting adjacent words (the class showed us how) worked much better. I was shocked and unbelieving. But i believe that was a proto attention mechanism."?

Why isn't accuracy whether it passes my personal linguistic tests to my satisfaction, something we generative linguists never could automate enough to satisfy even ourselves before the Attention mechanism came along?

Gemini: "Christopher Manning, a leading pioneer in NLP and a professor at Stanford, famously addresses this in the very first lecture of his renowned course, CS224n: Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning. He summarizes it with a single, profound line: "Perfect language understanding is AI-complete." "

Does it surprise you that I took the MOOC version of that course?

What if NLP is AI-complete?

What if I tried implementing rule-based natural language grammar à la Chomsky for decades but the performance was nowhere near just counting longer-range proximate word counts? Didn't we all learn the Chomsky hierarchy in CS classes?

Where's Chomsky's chatbot so I can test it for myself? How come they didn't need Chomsky's rules to solve things like anaphora, cataphora, passive to active, etc.?