Because they don't want to get rid of "dark money" they just want to use whataboutism to justify using it themselves. And by "they" I mean everybody.

AI isn't intelligent, it doesn't reason or analyze and isn't capable of introspection. It's a buzzword for an advanced predictive database, and if you understand that it can do some pretty neat things. But when you buy into the marketing hype and try to use it to do things it's not suited for then you fail.

He knows non-degree hires can usually be paid less, and it also "dovetails" into the sort of anti-Liberal signalling that gives Trump a raging semi.

right, but the entire purpose of this app is for gossip and trashtalking, which are things you shouldn't do "in writing" if you're worried about it ever coming back to you.

Read up on this case. Short version: lady vanishes in Taiwan under suspicious circumstances. Hubby's story doesn't add up. But there's no body or actual evidence of foul play. This lawyer guy gets hired to poke around and ask questions but other than a fishy story and some lies he finds nothing. As a result of his publicity now Taiwan wants the suspect for questioning but even if the US and China had an extradition agreement it probably wouldn't cover this situation since they haven't actually issued a warrant for arrest (etc.)

The only new thing here since the last time he got slashdot to Press Release his story is they managed to win a "Wrongful Death" lawsuit. So IF anything is wrong with US law, it's that you can get sued over an event that has never been proven to have happened, and lose millions of dollars.

Listen up, boomer, we asked the AI to write code to access the accounts and lists and it said it wasn't possible SO ITâ(TM)S NOT POSSIBLE.

Put simply, the Dems keep thinking that because they "deserve" to win that they actually will win. Most of their top leaders live in an echo chamber filled with their own farts, pander to the extreme ends of their base, and completely ignore Centrists and Moderates. The Dem "base" isn't reliable enough to turn out and even if they do, they don't have the numbers to win without pulling in the Independents. Nobody wanted Harris the first time, and barely put up with her as VP. The Dem Strategists should have known that Biden wasn't going to be a strong enough candidate, and if they'd gone all-in early with a fresh Pair of Candidates they probably would have won handily.

Most people today don't really understand that the Nazis were originally disliked because they were fascists, not that they were racists. A lot of people who opposed the Fascist ideology really didn't have much of an issue with racism at the time. The shift in tone to despising Nazis for being racists mostly came after the War. Now days I see people (especially on the Left) using the terms "Nazi" and "Racist" interchangeably even to the point of calling Zionists "Nazis," which is pretty tonedeaf.

Any time DC starts floundering they pump out a superman or Batman "reboot." Up until the success of Iron Man kicked off the MCU, Marvel's "go-to" was Spiderman, and to a lesser degree Hulk. But they managed to "mainstream" a bunch of properties (xmen, avengers, etc.) while DC has struggled to get any new "franchises" to really gain traction. So back to Supes and Batty they go for a cash infusion.

Yes, the "bump" is that the fundamental premise of "if we can just feed it enough data it will spontaneously attain AGI" is completely flawed. LLMs and similar models are fancy predictive algorithms which can do some pretty neat suff, but they can't "think" or "reason." For some relatively simple tasks their predictive outputs can seem to mimic intelligence, but the "intelligence" is an emergent property of the data itself as opposed to a result of the algorithms.

Other countries aren't free of stupidiry, quack science, or cronyism. Sometimes things are banned for good reasons and sometimes they're banned due to Protectionism or junk science.

logs are training data for their AI

a lottery is just a voluntary tax where every now and then someone gets to be rich. it's not surprising that some people become irrationally angry over the idea that you don't have to force people to give up their property. and it's understandable that seeing someone becoming rich through the voluntary actions of others would drive these people to the edge of insanity. because both of those concepts completely ruin their carefully crafted Marxist illusion of reality.

We quit hiring them, it's all just "vibe coding" now. Memory safe? lol nothing is safe now.

the point is that people who aren't already suffering from severe mental health issues don't suddenly develop them, but that's what the story is trying to imply.