No, the guy is telling you to ignore the criticisms and just use it. LLMs can be useful at things which are "fuzzy," where details like fact, accuracy, precision, repeatability, etc. aren't strict requirements. That's why they sometimes do well with image and language processing tasks, if given enough manual corrections and overrides.

Yes, if the power supply caught on fire due to overheating then it was a thermal event. Other reasons could include an electrical fault, or spread from another ignition source.

On most news sites these days it's difficult to claw your way through all the ads to get to the paywall, and on the off chance you make it through that it's literally just the same blurb that every other site has. And the real articles are sandwiched between a stack of "paid content" which are essentially just more ads disguised as articles that if clicked take you to an even more ad infested site. There's a few exceptions of course, but they are increasingly hard to find and the average person doesn't want news they want someone "important" to deliver a daily dose of reinforcement to their belief systems.

Obviously, because in the US if a store did this sort of thing you're going to get a fast out of court settlement. False accusation, public humiliation, emotional damages, etc. there's people who make a living out of trying to trick stores into accusing them of shoplifting.

Really? When was that? The only ones I remember were the special premiums like HBO.

Books contain information and can inspire thought in the reader, if the reader is capable of inspiration. AI is not capable of either thought or inspiration because at best it's a statistical model that can expose emergent patterns in data.

The dirty secret with the current AI "scam" is that there's a lot of manual tweaking and over-rides being added to hide shortcomings. A good example is that right now, if you ask google AI if you can cook food with gasoline it will flat out tell you "No." Which is demonstratably false, although it's not a great idea (for several reasons) you can indeed use gasoline as a fuel source for cooking. But google devs added that override because people were asking for recipes to cook with gas and the AI interpreted that as asking for a recipe where gas was an ingredient and happily hallucinating responses, which then got posted as memes leaving the AI with egg on its face.

He was making money selling rips of movies that weren't released yet. I don't really care if you sail the seas or not, this is a bit different.

they know who it is, read the summary.

It's common jargon in the bar and food service industry. If you run out of a menu item the cooks will "86" it, or if someone drinks too much and gets cut off or kicked out they have been "86'd" I've heard about a hundred different explanations as to the origin of the term but none that seemed to have any solid evidence.

code examples on forums aren't supposed to compile, it's an example so that you can learn how to write code that will compile. If all you want is someone to write code for you, go find a library (etc.) and use it. And to be perfectly blunt, if you're not adding comments into your code saying which llm and what query you used to generate it, you're being lazy and dishonest. Because it's not your code.

Why not? This article isn't about the US it's about a place which has free healthcare.

When did they announce that there will be an Online GTA6?

Seems like a nice low-effort way to get a payoff.

There are very few use cases for running a pair of lockstep VMs these days, it is almost always better to refactor the application to run as a cluster where the loss of any individual member doesn't degrade the service.

Things will make a lot more sense to you when you realize he doesn't care about the economy in general. He's getting his, rewarding his friends, and doing favors, and that's all that matters to him.