The GDPR has serious jurisdictional boundary issues. People in the EU need to understand that anything outside of their own country is "use at your own risk" if there's not a formal legal agreement (treaties, etc.) and to stop trying to push their local regulations globally.

If any of your accounts ever receives a ban, then posting under any of them is considered "circumventing" the ban and grounds for removal. As for damages, good luck. Under US law you have to actually prove damages, which are zero. I don't know if reddit has any legal presence in the UK or not, that's most likely the only chance you have of getting anywhere with them. The biggest issue with reddit is that random mods in subs can basically kick you off the entire site by reporting posts as general reddit rule violations. I quit using the site a few years ago after a mod in a sub got mad at a post I made, and went and reported posts I had left in a FPS video game sub as "inciting or encouraging violence." I of course appealed but it was determined that the posts still violated the site policy.

"I'm more than happy to do that for you. I've installed our AI Agent onto your phone, so you can just talk to us Live anytime you want without even dialing a number."

They're counting on sales boost from GTA 6. Also, rumors on upcoming console generations have gone from "probably 2027" to "might start seeing early Dev prototypes by end of 2027 and consumer launches in 28 or 29."

You? Hahaha no, they are the ones who want to run AI on your phone.

This post reads like it was written by a Fae

And I'm sure this move has absolutely nothing to do with the upcoming GTA6 release this fall.

**definition of "Good" subject to change without notice.

Call me nuts, but how about they just take my Doctor's word for me needing a refill of the medication?

No. The job problems are not because of AI. The "replaced by AI" is an excuse the Suits are using to distract from the actual reasons why hiring has stalled and layoffs are picking up.

Incorrect. Science is a process, if you "believe" in a claim or a result that's not Science. Science demands we constantly question and test things even when they are considered "settled." Questioning things like climate change is not Denial of Science. Refusing to question them is. Blindly following a result which caters to your desires is just as much of a problem as blindly rejecting the result.

It's almost impossible to find good sources. Most don't even tell you what sort of cooling is being used and are just shouting vaguely. Finding an article that actually tells you where the water is drawn from and where it goes is rare, because that would take actual effort to report and might take away from the currently popular "Big Tech BAD" narrative.

They were probably watching cspan and local government access channels.

Other than people buying chips specifically for AI nothing is really dependent on it though. Sure, there's a lot of Execs telling investors things about AI "adoption" but that's mostly just bullshit so that investors feel reassured that company X isn't missing out on the next big thing. And for the few who actually are using it to do actual work, losing Open AI itself is of no particular consequence.

It's almost as if there's more than one person in the US.