For the entire history of manufactured products, skilled mechanics could take them apart and see how they worked. Mechanical stuff is inherently open-source.
Then the rise of digital systems gave companies the ability to eliminate a right we have had for centuries.
We are not demanding new rights, we are protesting when old rights are taken away.

"long-range quantum magnetometry to find the electromagnetic fingerprint of a human heartbeat"
Smells like bullshit

It often gives excellent answers, but when it doesn't, the results are strange.
I asked for help writing code for an obscure hobby CNC control system.
It totally invented function calls and invented plausible documentation to explain how they worked and how to call them.
It totally missed the easy answer that involved calling an existing simple function and writing no new code.
If the answer doesn't exist on the internet, it appears to just make one up

...is not a crime
If he committed crimes, he should face justice in a court of law, with trustworthy evidence

...laughing uncontrollably at its extremely poor quality

Every day, everything seems to get worse, whether politics or tech, everything seems to get worse.
Every day

...the adoption of robots

Learning to use new, immature tech is inherently problematic and we never get it right at first
The tech will improve and out way of using it will adapt

It takes a while to learn how to effectively use new tech, especially powerful tech that is rapidly changing
Expect more confusion and disruption before things stabilize

They are continuing to follow fads and introduce new "features" that nobody wants, and that can't easily be uninstalled
They need to stop adding this crap, and provide easy ways to uninstall it
They need to use every tool they have, including AI, to find bugs and security weaknesses
If something is good, people will choose it voluntarily and even pay for it
If something is installed by default and can't be removed, it's likely not good
We need a reliable OS

The USPS was designed for letters. Now letter volume is way down and package volume is increasing rapidly. Small post offices that were designed for letters are overwhelmed with packages. Delivery vehicles are small. To properly handle high package volume, a lot of facilities would need to be upgraded or replaced

Does it work?
Kids are smart and really good at finding workarounds
The likely outcome is political theater, where politicians claim success while kids get creative
The other likely outcome is annoyance and failure when the tech goes wrong

Instead of using AI to "increase productivity" by quickly generating bloated, inefficient, bug-ridden, insecure slop, the better use of the tools is to find bugs, security weaknesses and unhandled edge conditions. AI research should focus on creating better code, bug-free, efficient and secure with all edge cases handled

Immature tech is immature
AI tech is making real, rapid and exciting progress, but is still immature.
The hypemongers make outrageous fantasy claims.
The tech sometimes works great, sometimes mediocre, and sometimes fails catastrophically.
Anyone who believes that the tech is perfected deserves what they get.

WTF?
This is one of the stupidest things I've seen
How stupid can stupid get before it all collapses into a black hole of stupidity?