Comment Re:Hid your PhD (Score 1) 232
Hmm interesting. That explains H.R. 6429 that passed recently.
http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/STEM/Fact%20Sheet%20STEM%20Bill.pdf
Submission + - Shareholders sue Novell Board (groklaw.net)
dgharmon writes: If you thought the deal smelled funny back in 2011 when Novell sold itself to Attachmate and its patents to a Microsoft consortium, you are not alone. Some shareholders .. sued ..
Specifically, they claim that Novell favored Attachmate over other bidders, especially a "Party C", and the judge, under Delaware's reasonable ‘conceivability’ standard, denied summary judment with respect to the board and decided there will need to be a trial ...
Specifically, they claim that Novell favored Attachmate over other bidders, especially a "Party C", and the judge, under Delaware's reasonable ‘conceivability’ standard, denied summary judment with respect to the board and decided there will need to be a trial
Submission + - What are the Unwritten Rules of Deleting Code? (arstechnica.com) 3
Press2ToContinue writes: I came across this page that asks the question, "what are the unwritten rules of deleting code?"
It made me realize that I have seen no references to generally-accepted best-practice documents regarding code modification, deletion, or rewrites. I would imagine /.'s have come across them if they exist. The answers may be somewhat language-dependent, but what best practices do /.'s use when they modify production code?
It made me realize that I have seen no references to generally-accepted best-practice documents regarding code modification, deletion, or rewrites. I would imagine
Slashdot Top Deals
A LISP programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing. -- Alan Perlis
