Bet this is modded something like +4 Troll the next time I look.

Perspective is important. It's an extrapolated figure, based on trace-element factors for Cd, Cr, Mn, Ni, but not lead. That seems incredibly dishonest.

What's more, they report 0.86–1.70 ng/m ambient lead level... which upon brief examination, is about 1/4th the average urban ambient lead level, and from what I'm able to determine, about 20% of the EPA 2022–2024 non-source Pb-TSP daily mean. In other words, it's significantly lower than sources with known lead. (Similarly, it's about ~20% of historic ambient national levels - couldn't find date later than 2019 for this.)

Looks like they played very Orwellian with their data interpretation. "The use of wood as an energy source is a relic of the past, one that should not be relived if given a choice." is... well. This is "let them eat cake" level hubris. Whoever said this either has a disdain for the people they're's studying, or have zero economic understanding.... and based on the actual study findings, I can't say it appears to be truthful, either.

The people who burn wood are not doing it out of personal preference. They're doing because they can afford it: they have no other choice. Chopping, splitting, drying, and burning wood is a labor intensive activity. It's done out of fiscal/economic necessity: fuel prices for heating are extremely high, and in the area they sampled, they rely primarily on heating oil (basically: diesel fuel). Even last winter, the average household heating cost was about $1800/month, about twice what it was in 2015. With fuel prices surging? You can effectively expect twice that cost (or more) this coming winter due to the conflict with Iran.

Musing: Were the lead actually higher in the area (from what I can tell, it's not), I wonder if the "high" lead in the air would be representative of "carbon sequestration" of the trees over the past 70 odd years: as they grew, they absorbed the lead in the air?

What are you, a commiebot? You're spamming multiple threads with this nonsense.

Why don't you just propose burning the corporate facilities and the farms of people who don't eagerly comply, too?

The result is the same.

Sure, if you're building them to 1970s common practice.

A modern DC uses as much water as a Super Walmart, and a modern nuclear facility is passively cooled and recycles its water (as in, uses it repeatedly).

That's a symptom of economies of scale, and excessive de-industrializing regulation. Nuke plants have been a one-off, unique design with little reproduced between them. When they have been built in recent memory, it's been with 1950s technology.

If we instead institutionally embraced newer (safer, cheaper) reactor designs and built them at scale (with industrialized QA), we'd have safe, clean nuclear power for 200 years+ in the US, just using the existing nuclear waste.

There are enough public instances of people losing their Google account due to Google's policy and automation that this is likely a very bad idea.

I've got less than a year of email locally in Thunderbird for one mail account and it tops 10GB.

I think you underestimate the amount of space files can take: attached files take up a lot. What do I do with that email, delete it? That's not a workable solution if I want to retain the metadata associated with the files (which I do).

No one in America really wants them (EVs).

But that's not to say they shouldn't keep trying for markets that do want them....parts of the EU seem really hungry for them.

Wanting America to lose a war we had no business starting in the first place by the President of the United States of Israel isn't TDS. The swing voters in the middle were voting for the person who stood against wars and kept America out of it the first time. After the three entirely fake assassination attempts (his ear is 100% fine folks. He could have at least surgically removed a chunk to make it believable), it's clear this was a very long con game. I think Trump knew he'd go to war in his lame duck term for his handlers and the Epstein class that truly runs the world. It was just deferred by 4 years, and who knows, maybe that whole pile of bullshit was wagging the dog too.

Wow...just....wow.

You might want to get your meds checked man...seriously.

Are the voices telling all this...or is it the tree in the neighbors yard that tells you this when it stops humming?

That's not an apt comparison, since bikes don't have an auto shifter. They don't even have a dry clutch like cars do - they have a wet clutch, which enables you to do things like ease or slam in and out of a gear while accelerating or deaccelerating, which is like 50% of the riding experience: it allows for launch, wheelies, better corner control, wheel-on-pavement control, and so on, depending on what you're trying to do.

Same reason why driving a shitbox honda civic with a manual is many times more fun than driving a newer vehicle with more HP and better handling, which is a smooth auto. It actually takes skill to do well, and that makes it fun.

And, to play devil's advocate, most cars nowadays also have the ability to pick a specific auto-clutched gear with the auto gearbox: you can go from first, to 2nd, or if you want, accelerate into 2nd from third and back to third for a bit of a launch. Not only is this more fun, it's extremely useful for controlling the vehicle on winding hill grades and bad weather driving: you use the gear ratio and the rolling resistance (while improving fuel economy) instead of the brakes on the downside of the hill - similar energetic effect as "reactive charging brakes", but less likely to send you to the ditch on an icy road.

Now if it could help me find the flash drive with $125 in 2012 bitcoin that sat on my truck's dashboard for a couple years before I lost it, that'd be great.

2) The unreleased music might have been master recordings to be used in a future album. I don't know if you are aware that master recordings are worth a lot. Artists spend years and millions trying to buy back the master recordings they signed away to get their first record deals.

Master recordings of a bunch of tree frogs at night....likely aren't worth all that much.

I would be inclined to consider any master recordings of any Beyonce content to be lesser than tree frog recordings....so....

I can't imagine anything from Beyonce would be worth that much....you coulnd't pay me to take ownership of that crap, much less even go to a concert....

The days of real music are long gone.....

Felony theft?!?!?

I wouldn't give $0.20 for all the described contents of that suitcase.....

IHMO, he got too harsh of a sentence for stealing worthless trash....