Comment shades of Lysenkoism (Score 1) 199
Ideology vetos reality, news at 11.
Ideology vetos reality, news at 11.
A lot of people behave pretty ghastly when it comes to money.
If this is accurate, this suggests that abiogenesis is easy once one has a stable, watery environment, since it happened twice on Earth.
That was my first thought too. (Assuming the article is correct - all kinds of stuff gets published that doesn't hold up in the longer run.)
One potential conclusion about the Fermi paradox [...]
Remember that time is also big. Suppose that there have been 1000 interstellar civilizations in our galaxy during the past 5 billion years, and that each one lasted a million years before collapsing. How many would be active right now?
Frankly, I don't consider it a paradox at all. We've explored approximately 0% of our galaxy and found nothing. That doesn't tell us much.
Doesn't he know he's supposed to play the fiddle while he destroys his country?
This has to be a troll. Nobody on Slashdot is actually this stupid.
I'm skeptical about that second part.
As for trolls, I wonder if some anti-vax propaganda is being pushed by hostile foreign powers as a way of hurting us.
It's just a story about Meta and AI.
Oh, nevermind.
For extremists of all flavors, violence is always preferable to the voting booth.
Surely they're not going to cut off the data centers just so ordinary people can have electricity?
I never see Democrats defend Pelosi trading. I see maggots defending Trump grifts constantly. I hang out in places where I'm exposed to both. Stop making shit up, maggot.
I think there's some nuance needed there.
Pelosi's trading is legal, it's highly problematic from an ethics perspective, but it's completely legal and somewhat common for legislators to do. So she can be criticized for using an unfair advantage, but it's not unprecedented nor a major sin.
Trump's grifts on the other hand do violate laws and precedent, those laws just aren't enforced.
For an extra $100k you get a pardon!
Well, yes. But the politicians say the scientists are wrong.
Who are you going to believe? Geeky nerd types, or the people who actually run the real world?
Yeah, it's going to be hard to establish a plausible positive ROI for interstellar travel. I think even public funding for probes will be problematic, since it will take years just to get flyby photos. Probably the first flyby will be funded by some rich guy.
You have a message from the operator.