Not sure if this is so obvious it's not worth mentioning, but given the geo-aware capabilities of smart phone, Google looks poised to bring advertisements to your phone, where you are. 'Sponsored Links' for your augmented reality browser.

What I find most revealing in your comment, which I think other posters should think more carefully about, is:

When a person resists the expectations of our culture's gender socialization, we consider that person unconventional, non-conformist, deviant, or something of the sort.

However, when a person adopts those gender expectations, we call that "natural."

cheers, Mike

It's simple, folks. Instead of figuring out how to consume their garbage for free, let's ignore them entirely.
Cheers, Mike

when you look at the long-term contribution trends http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=B02

Cheers, Mike

You make a good point about "starter Windows users" unintentionally running a lot of idle programs in the background. But why isn't the solution to design the OS to intelligently save and suspend those processes to free up resources? It seems like the paradigm of users being responsible for opening and closing programs is broken and outdated.

Cheers, Mike

I can only speak for myself, but the immediacy of seeing my contributions go live, so to speak, is very seductive and entices me to contribute more to the project. If the current model has been successful, it is because it attracts new members who may ultimately become wikiholics. Any new barriers to participation (even social-psychological ones, like I mentioned) might lower recruitment rates, making the community harder to sustain. At least that is my hypothesis.

Cheers, Mike

What about vandalism that's not so easy to spot? Like a subtle change to an article that (presumably) is not on a lot of people's watchlist? How would the FlaggedRev system handle these types of edits? Would it create tacit approval for these changes? Would it be difficult to revert them at a later time, since at that point the rv would itself look like vandalism? Just a thought.

Cheers, Mike

Thanks for the insight. I am willing to see how the trial goes.

Cheers, Mike

Or maybe some type of highlighting for unreviewed edits?

Cheers, Mike

Agreed - can someone who has followed this more closely clarify what counts as a trusted user? Also, what subset of pages would be subject to the FlaggedRev system?

Cheers, Mike

Let me be the first to say, as an infrequent Wikipedia contributor, that a FlaggedRev system would drive me away from the project.

Cheers, Mike

But Justice Adams agreed with the magistrate, finding that while The Simpsons characters had hands with four fingers and their faces were "markedly and deliberately different to those of any possible human being", the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people.

Indeed! this is certainly a convoluted hyperreality on par with South Park's Imaginationland.

Cheers, Mike

Occupational prestige counts as much as salary, too.

Cheers, Mike

Why are men interested in studying CS, engineering, or physical sciences?

When you find the answer to that question, everything else starts to make sense. My understanding is that gender expectations, childhood socialization, educational opportunities, and occupational prestige and rewards explain this gap pretty well.

Cheers, Mike