nt

ok, this is why your jokes just don't land on the college demographic. maybe don't be critical of folks not having a date in 20 years when most of them are barely in their 20s? i know you guys like them young but that's also your problem.

You guys seem to be offended that some people don't find your humor funny. It's weird. I like music X, do you also love music X? No? I'm offended. That's you.

I did too with Gallagher, can't stand a minute of his clips now with all that food he was wasting.

Even if what you say were true, you've elevated today's youth into a more civil population then condemed them for it. It's nobodies problem if a comedian fails to land their intentions but their own. Try should try new material.

Chris Rock is 60, Jerry Seinfeld is 70. When will these fossils learn that they are 3-4 generations removed from the current humor preferences of the current college youth? Celebrities who expect to be relevant to every new demographic have serious personality issues. Just because Jerry Seinfeld dated a 17 year old when he was 37 doesnt mean he's relevant to younger people.

" The AI labs should probably be nationalized for national security reasons." the amount of nonsense and atrocity that happens under "national security" and we have something that we can finally 'objectivily' analyze massive data with and we want to hand that over so the government can implement their biases. great.

You are saying the numbers on MLK's approval/dissaproval are different for his ideas versus his protest tactics? but you then say his direct action was peaceful? So why was his dissproval nearly 70% during his life?

"Some circles" being the general population. His disapproval at time of death was around 70%. I advise you to read primary sources. Read MLK's own writings. He wasn't just critic, he proposed solutions by force (see his economic bill of rights). To make a point, you're quote of AOC is factually wrong, she didn't call it crazy, she's talking about someone else. But your secondary sources don't show you that, so you go to form invalid points.

I would never want to "root out racisim" since I believe in freedom of mind.

Actually it is quite rare to hear about this...therefore I'd posit that this illustrates that it is NOT systemic or pervasive in today's society.

Disagree, personal experiences aside, you just have to open the catalog of some legal group that persues dicriminatory cases to see how often they occur. We shouldn't deny our massive anti-discrimination accomplishments of the last 50 years by being blind to new incidents.

How often do we see a police dept ousted because a bunch of their officers had a racist group chat going? Is that not systemic? Enforcers of the law holding discriminatory viewsâ¦

MLK was much more than that standard issue quote. The way yall keep washing him out is embarrassing. Importantly he was called a communist, harassed by the FBI, and deeply unpopular while alive. Rest of your comparisons are nonsense.

give us a break. everytime some minority gets a job there's hordes of people to criqute them as "DEI hire." it's almost like the anti-woke are operating under other assumptions.

What do you think people opposed to changes in the 1960s sounded like? They were identical to today's anti-woke.

Here is the end-game in plain view.